Bug Hunting Session
Bug 62787 - TDF Site: Enhancement request: Make checksums of daily builds available
Summary: TDF Site: Enhancement request: Make checksums of daily builds available
Status: RESOLVED MOVED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: WWW (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.0.0.3 release
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: easyHack
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-27 01:17 UTC by webofht-libreofficebugs002
Modified: 2015-12-18 10:03 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description webofht-libreofficebugs002 2013-03-27 01:17:09 UTC
Problem description: It is _not_ possible to find the checksums of the daily builds. The checksums such as md5, sha1 and sha512 checksums are useful for checking the integrity of files. Since the files are large, there can be accidental transmission errors. Users could be allowed to check if the files downloaded are complete and are not corrupt files when the checksums are given.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Visit
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-0/
2. _No_ checksums are found.

Current behavior: _No_ checksums of daily builds are found.

Expected behavior: Add checksums of daily builds. For example, 

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-0/
Linux-x86@34-Release-Configuration-RHEL5-Baseline/
2013-03-18_06.57.39/sha1sum.txt

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-0/
Linux-x86@34-Release-Configuration-RHEL5-Baseline/
2013-03-18_06.57.39/sha512sum.txt

(Using Bug Submission Assistant, I am not sure if the correct _sub-component_ was selected.)


Operating System: All
Version: 4.0.0.3 release
Comment 1 Nino 2013-03-28 18:00:08 UTC
For Daily Builds, I didn't find them either, so changing to -> NEW 

However, for convenient end user builds, there are at least GPG signatures, see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2013-March/003954.html
Comment 2 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2013-04-08 07:27:57 UTC
Having checksums of our daily builds seems like a good candidate for an EasyHack. I assume it would be a little extra code added to the tinbuild system...
Comment 3 webofht-libreofficebugs002 2014-02-02 02:04:03 UTC
Confirm the same issue:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
Comment 4 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2014-02-02 05:01:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Having checksums of our daily builds seems like a good candidate for an
> EasyHack. I assume it would be a little extra code added to the tinbuild
> system...

Cloph - Could please you verify if this is an EasyHack?

Thanks!
Comment 5 Christian Lohmaier 2014-02-05 17:46:40 UTC
It is an easy hack, although just fixing in the build bot repo isn't enough - you also need to ping tinderbox administrators to update their scripts.

Tinderbox build scripts are in contrib/buildbot repository (there are three variants)
Comment 6 Joel Madero 2014-02-27 23:03:41 UTC
In order to limit the confusion between ProposedEasyHack and EasyHack and to make queries much easier we are changing ProposedEasyHack to NeedsDevEval.

Thank you and apologies for the noise
Comment 7 Dennis Roczek 2015-06-28 09:18:35 UTC
as confirmed by cloph, this is an easyhack
Comment 8 Dennis Roczek 2015-10-25 13:20:21 UTC
Ticket moved to Redmine, see https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/issues/1555
Comment 9 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2015-12-18 10:03:30 UTC
Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (EasyHack)
[NinjaEdit]