Bug Hunting Session
Bug 84559 - QA module for references
Summary: QA module for references
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.3 Daily
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-10-01 15:51 UTC by Daniel Grigoras
Modified: 2015-07-18 17:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Grigoras 2014-10-01 15:51:13 UTC
How about implementing a QA (Quality Assurance) module for checking references. I work with many large documents and I'm having trouble spotting invalid references ("Error: Reference not found")

As I work with a master document, for some reason I spot the invalid references only at the master document level, and some are invalid only in the master document, while being valid in the subdocument itself.
Comment 1 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2014-11-23 13:24:41 UTC
(In reply to Darius Daniel Grigoras from comment #0)
> How about implementing a QA (Quality Assurance) module for checking
> references. I work with many large documents and I'm having trouble spotting
> invalid references ("Error: Reference not found")

Sounds interesting. What would this module look like? What specifically would it provide for users?

> As I work with a master document, for some reason I spot the invalid
> references only at the master document level, and some are invalid only in
> the master document, while being valid in the subdocument itself.

Hmm... so how do you think the reference-checker should deal with your example of refs that are valid in a sub-document but not in a master document?

(After you answer the q's, please change the status back to 'UNCONFIRMED')
Comment 2 QA Administrators 2015-06-08 14:29:34 UTC
Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.
 
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

This NEEDINFO Message was generated on: 2015-06-08

Warm Regards,
QA Team
Comment 3 QA Administrators 2015-07-18 17:28:04 UTC
Dear Bug Submitter,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INVALID due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. 
Please do not:
a) respond via email 
b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of FDO

Message generated on: 2015-07-18