1)Draw whatever with libreoffice 2)Export it to png with default settings. 3)Open the .png 4)See how you entered the 22nd century with pixels almost as big as an apple. I am sure it is thinkable to do so that defaults settings save in High Definition (At least Microsoft Office can think of doing that) Second nobody understand how to change the settings (Why the fuck changing pixel per centimeters should change the size of the image???) in other word, if I want to increase the pixel density the image size MUST stay identical ! Best regards
TESTING with LO 4.3.5.2 + Ubuntu 14.04 (In reply to renn0xtek9 from comment #0) > 1)Draw whatever with libreoffice I drew a big smiley face > 2)Export it to png with default settings. 8.5" x 11" image, with resolution of 37px/cm (Side note: I filed bug 88132 re: mixed units) > 3)Open the .png I used GNOME's eog. > 4)See how you entered the 22nd century with pixels almost as big as an apple. As in an Apple computer, or the pomaceous fruit? The pixels don't look too huge to me, but maybe I don't have a huge/high-res screen? > I am sure it is thinkable to do so that defaults settings save in High > Definition (At least Microsoft Office can think of doing that) Defaults can always be changed, but there's a trade-off between resolution and file size. What would you suggest for a default resolution? Status -> NEEDINFO (Please change status to UNCONFIRMED after you've provided the info) > Second nobody understand how to change the settings > (Why the fuck changing pixel per centimeters should change the size of the > image???) > in other word, if I want to increase the pixel density the image size MUST > stay identical ! If I open the export dialog (File -> Export -> (choose in the drop-down) PNG), then I can change the Width, Height, or Resolution. Changing the Width/Height does not affect the Resolution, but changing the Resolution does cause the Width/Height to change. I agree that this doesn't seem optimal to me, but I believe I've seen this behavior with other programs that handle raster images, so perhaps there's a good reason?
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team This NEEDINFO message was generated on: 2015-07-18
> 8.5" x 11" image, with resolution of 37px/cm > (Side note: I filed bug 88132 re: mixed units) > Well if you want to print it, ti me 37px/cm is far too low. If you insert the png in a pdf, one will see that it is not sharp at all
Dear Bug Submitter, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INVALID due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of FDO Message generated on: 2015-09-03