Bug 100307 - Problem installing non-basic extension as shared in Linux (see comment 5)
Summary: Problem installing non-basic extension as shared in Linux (see comment 5)
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Extensions (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
Inherited From OOo
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: needsDevAdvice
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-06-10 11:20 UTC by rolfofsaxony
Modified: 2020-05-30 18:26 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description rolfofsaxony 2016-06-10 11:20:55 UTC
OS	-	Linux pc64 3.19.0-32-generic #37~14.04.1-Ubuntu
		Mate Rosa 17.3
Libreoffice	-	Version: 5.0.3.2
				Build ID: 1:5.0.3~rc2-0ubuntu1~trusty2
				Locale: en-GB (en_GB.UTF-8)


Installing an oxt extension as shared, registers and works for the superuser
but not for other users.

../user/extensions/shared/log.txt
###### Progress log entry 2016-06-10 12:42:59 ######
ERROR: (com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException) { { { Message = "There is no such extension deployed: footswitch", Context = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @2b4ee90 } }, ArgumentPosition = (short) -1 }
ERROR: (com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException) { { { Message = "There is no such extension deployed: footswitch", Context = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @2b4ee90 } }, ArgumentPosition = (short) -1 }
Copying: footswitch.oxt
###### Progress log entry 2016-06-10 12:43:28 ######

The same extension can be installed for the user individually
Comment 1 rolfofsaxony 2016-06-10 15:28:32 UTC
It turns out that AddOns.xcu and its parent directory were still owned by root

so:
~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/extensions/shared/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/lu178289vkw8g.tmp was owned by root in group root
as was the AddOns.xcu in that directory

Given that you have to be superuser to install an extension as shared, I deem it an error that the local files are left as owned as root.
Comment 2 Cor Nouws 2016-08-05 22:33:46 UTC
Hi,

(In reply to rolfofsaxony from comment #0)
> Installing an oxt extension as shared, registers and works for the superuser
> but not for other users.

How did you do the installation?
Comment 3 rolfofsaxony 2016-08-06 15:21:31 UTC
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #2)
> Hi,
> 
> (In reply to rolfofsaxony from comment #0)
> > Installing an oxt extension as shared, registers and works for the superuser
> > but not for other users.
> 
> How did you do the installation?

it's been nearly a month, so I don't recall on that specific occasion.
However, running through it again this afternoon I got the following:

sudo su
lowriter
use extension manager
add extension
all users

start lowriter as a user
package is registered and menu items visible

click a function and get the following error:

A Scripting Framework error occurred while running the Python script
vnd.sun.star.script:footswitch.oxt|footswitch|footswitch.py$EditConfigurationFile?language=Python&location=user:uno_packages.

Message: <class 'KeyError'>: 'footswitch.oxt'
  /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/pythonscript.py:379 in function
getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl() [package = self.mapPackageName2Path[
packageName ]]
  /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/pythonscript.py:987 in function
getScript() [self.provCtx.uriHelper.getStorageURI(scriptUri) );]

files:
/var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu4412jaclz4.tmp_/
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Aug  6 16:38 footswitch.oxt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    0 Aug  6 16:38 footswitch.oxtproperties

In the footswitch.oxt directory:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   1216 Aug  6 16:38 51-footswitch.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    105 Aug  6 16:38 51-microdialo.hwdb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    109 Aug  6 16:38 51-microdialov220.hwdb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   5076 Aug  6 16:38 Accelerators.xcu
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7554 Aug  6 16:38 Addons.xcu
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   1413 Aug  6 16:38 description.xml
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root   4096 Aug  6 16:38 footswitch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    326 Aug  6 16:38 footswitch.ini
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 599560 Aug  6 16:38 footswitch.pdf
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root   4096 Aug  6 16:38 icons
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2792 Aug  6 16:38 messages_de.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2614 Aug  6 16:38 messages_en.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2855 Aug  6 16:38 messages_es.txt
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root   4096 Aug  6 16:38 META-INF
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root   4096 Aug  6 16:38 Office
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root   4096 Aug  6 16:38 pkg-desc




 ~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/extensions/shared/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/lu4547jafah5.tmp $
drwxr-xr-x 2 rolf rolf 4096 Aug  6 16:40 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 rolf rolf 4096 Aug  6 16:40 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 rolf rolf 8058 Aug  6 16:40 Addons.xcu

I sent via email the extension, just in case the problem lies with it.
Comment 4 Jean-Baptiste Faure 2017-09-09 12:18:50 UTC
Hi,

(In reply to rolfofsaxony from comment #0)
> [...]
> Installing an oxt extension as shared, registers and works for the superuser
> but not for other users.

Why do you think it is a bug ?

Set status to NEEDINFO, please set it back to UNCONFIRMED once requested
informations are provided.

Best regards. JBF
Comment 5 rolfofsaxony 2017-09-10 14:10:51 UTC
Finally found a reference to what I assume is the same issue
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102542

"The current URI specification for running a non-Basic script (JavaScript, BeanShell, 
Java, Python) is :
vnd.sun.star.script:MACROREF?language=Language&location=[user|share|document]

The consequence is that an extension containing a non-Basic script will contain URI's 
where the running level is fixed : either <user> or <shell>. These URI's are hard-
written for example in the AddonUI.xcu file, or in the event tab of a dialog control.
So if the extension designer wants its extension to be installed in user or shared 
levels, he/she must provide and maintain two variants of the same extension.
"

I assumed that I could add both URI's in Addons.xcu (for example like so)
                        
<prop oor:name="URL" oor:type="xs:string">
 <value>vnd.sun.star.script:bookmarktoggle.oxt|bookmarktoggle|bookmarktoggle.py$BookmarkToggle?language=Python&amp;location=user:uno_packages</value>
                        
 <value>vnd.sun.star.script:bookmarktoggle.oxt|bookmarktoggle|bookmarktoggle.py$BookmarkToggle?language=Python&amp;location=share:uno_packages</value>
</prop>

and depending on whether the extension was loaded as "user" or "all-users" the appropriate URI would be used. That does not appear to be the case.

The bug https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102542 seems to describe exactly the issue that I am having.
I trust this clears up any doubts you have. Indeed given this information you may be able to come straight back with an answer, if this issue is now fixed in LibreOffice.

Regards
Rolf
Comment 6 rolfofsaxony 2017-09-23 15:04:46 UTC
I have investigated further and the issue seems to arise around the getPackageName2PathMap function in pythonscript.py

Once the extension is installed for "All Users" it gets stored in /var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages under a *.tmp_ directory.

Sudo'ing into lowriter once can see that this is recognised and loaded.
Starting lowriter as a normal user, no initial attempt is made to load extensions in /var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages.
However if you attempt to activate the extension, an attempt is made but returns 0 (Zero) extensions.
Below is the Debug listing from lowriter first running as sudo and secondly as a normal user.

sudo lowriter

(soffice:6281): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_icon_list: icons too large

(soffice:6281): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_icon_list: icons too large
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript loading
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript finished intializing
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] Entering PythonScriptProvider.ctorshare:uno_packages
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] initialized urihelper with baseUri=file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages,m_scriptUriLocation=share:uno_packages
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] got urlHelper <pythonscript.MyUriHelper object at 0x7fcc01b895f8>
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] share:uno_packages transformed to file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript: getPackageName2PathMap start getDeployedPackages
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript: getPackageName2PathMap end getDeployedPackages (1)
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] inspecting package bookmarktoggle.oxt(bookmarktoggle)
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [ERROR] adding Package lu5912xamblb.tmp_ ('file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle',)
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] hasByName called vnd.sun.star.expand:$UNO_SHARED_PACKAGES_CACHE/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] hasByName file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle True
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] hasByName called vnd.sun.star.expand:$UNO_SHARED_PACKAGES_CACHE/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] hasByName file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle True
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] hasByName called vnd.sun.star.expand:$UNO_SHARED_PACKAGES_CACHE/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle
Sat Sep 23 14:42:35 2017 [DEBUG] hasByName file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle True


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

lowriter

(soffice:6499): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_icon_list: icons too large

(soffice:6499): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_icon_list: icons too large

#
#The following only happens after attempting to invoke the extension
#whilst when running as sudo pythonscript is invoked upon startup of lowriter
#for whatever reason the number of "deployedpackages" is returned as Zero, when
#quite clearly, there is a package installed in /var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages
#

pythonloader.Loader ctor
pythonloader.Loader.activate
pythonloader: interpreting url vnd.openoffice.pymodule:pythonscript
pythonloader: after expansion vnd.openoffice.pymodule:pythonscript
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript loading
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript finished intializing
Fetched ImplHelper as <unohelper.ImplementationHelper object at 0x7fb3fb7e9630>
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] Entering PythonScriptProvider.ctorshare:uno_packages
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] initialized urihelper with baseUri=file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages,m_scriptUriLocation=share:uno_packages
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] got urlHelper <pythonscript.MyUriHelper object at 0x7fb3fb7e9828>
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] share:uno_packages transformed to file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript: getPackageName2PathMap start getDeployedPackages
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] pythonscript: getPackageName2PathMap end getDeployedPackages (0)
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] getScript vnd.sun.star.script:bookmarktoggle.oxt|bookmarktoggle|bookmarktoggle.py$BookmarkToggle?language=Python&location=share:uno_packages invoked
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [DEBUG] converting scriptURI=vnd.sun.star.script:bookmarktoggle.oxt|bookmarktoggle|bookmarktoggle.py$BookmarkToggle?language=Python&location=share:uno_packages to storageURI=file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle/bookmarktoggle.py$BookmarkToggle
Sat Sep 23 14:46:44 2017 [ERROR] <class 'KeyError'>: 'bookmarktoggle.oxt'
  /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/pythonscript.py:380 in function getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl() [package = self.mapPackageName2Path[ packageName ]]
  /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/pythonscript.py:988 in function getScript() [self.provCtx.uriHelper.getStorageURI(scriptUri) );]


(soffice:6499): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_icon_list: icons too large


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You will note that the normal user debug listing is looking for
file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle/bookmarktoggle.py$BookmarkToggle

rather than
file:///var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/lu5912xamblb.tmp_/bookmarktoggle.oxt/bookmarktoggle

if you need more information let me know.
regards
Rolf
Comment 7 Justin L 2017-11-01 14:15:57 UTC Comment hidden (no-value)
Comment 8 rolfofsaxony 2017-11-03 10:06:24 UTC
(In reply to Justin L from comment #7)
> I do this all the time, but yes - you can't run LibreOffice as sudo,
> otherwise the users files are owned as root.  Here is the bash code that I
> use to install shared extensions as part of my machine rollout:
> 
> #
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> # Set LibreOffice defaults with extension
> #
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>   if [ -z "$(pgrep soffice)" ]; then
>     LO_EXTENSION=LanguageTool-3.5.oxt
>     if [ -e ${LO_EXTENSION} ]; then
>       echo   Adding ${LO_EXTENSION} extension
>       unopkg   add   --shared    ${LO_EXTENSION}
>     else
>       echo "  ... unable to find ${LO_EXTENSION}"
>     fi
>   else
>     echo "  ... LibreOffice is running, so skipping adding any extensions"
>   fi
> 
> Marking as works for me. I've been doing this since 4.x, and most recently
> on 5.4.2. See the help file for how to install shared extensions at
> https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/Extension_Manager

This bug report is specifically about python extensions and as far as I know LanguageTool is not written in python.
The command that you have provided, may well work with Basic or Java extensions but it fails with python.
Installing as superuser, installs ONLY for superuser even if the install for all users option is selected.
Installing using sudo and selecting install for all users, shows the extension for all users but than fails miserably, when asked to activate, being that it cannot find the path of the extension.
I have even tried creating another version specifically for multiuser installation, where the Addons.xcu file contains location=share:uno_packages rather than the usual location=user:uno_packages entry but that fails too.
Comment 9 Xisco Faulí 2017-11-04 09:02:38 UTC
You can't confirm your own bugs. Moving it back to UNCONFIRMED until someone else confirms it.
Comment 10 Xisco Faulí 2018-01-10 16:07:27 UTC
> The bug https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102542 seems to describe
> exactly the issue that I am having.
> I trust this clears up any doubts you have. Indeed given this information
> you may be able to come straight back with an answer, if this issue is now
> fixed in LibreOffice.

Setting version to Inherit from OOo then
Comment 11 Justin L 2018-02-14 13:04:02 UTC
One idea: try to install as a "bundled extension" and see if that works. That is what I started doing in Ubuntu 18.04.

LO_EXTENSION_DIR=/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions
unzip -q -d "${LO_EXTENSION_DIR}/${LO_EXTENSION}"  "${LO_EXTENSION}.oxt"
Comment 12 Xisco Faulí 2018-03-19 15:53:55 UTC
(In reply to Justin L from comment #11)
> One idea: try to install as a "bundled extension" and see if that works.
> That is what I started doing in Ubuntu 18.04.
> 
> LO_EXTENSION_DIR=/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions
> unzip -q -d "${LO_EXTENSION_DIR}/${LO_EXTENSION}"  "${LO_EXTENSION}.oxt"

Dear Reporter,
Could you please try what Justin L is suggesting?

I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once you have test it
Comment 13 rolfofsaxony 2018-03-19 19:44:22 UTC
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #12)
> (In reply to Justin L from comment #11)
> > One idea: try to install as a "bundled extension" and see if that works.
> > That is what I started doing in Ubuntu 18.04.
> > 
> > LO_EXTENSION_DIR=/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions
> > unzip -q -d "${LO_EXTENSION_DIR}/${LO_EXTENSION}"  "${LO_EXTENSION}.oxt"
> 
> Dear Reporter,
> Could you please try what Justin L is suggesting?
> 
> I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to
> 'UNCONFIRMED' once you have test it

Installed it as a bundled extension.
chmod the directory structure and files of the extension in /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/ with +rx
The extension displays in the Extension Manager as Locked (A padlock symbol)
The extension does not display in the LibreOffice Macros or My Macros in the Run Macro dialog
This option, sadly, doesn't help, unless someone knows how to resolve the permission issue.
Arguably, one shouldn't have to jump through these sorts of hoops anyway.
Comment 14 altclava 2018-04-29 09:13:38 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 15 rolfofsaxony 2018-04-30 13:34:06 UTC
(In reply to altclava from comment #14)
> I encounter this problem too, in Ubuntu 16.04 and LibreOffice 5.1
> Is there anything I can do to help to fix it?

Edit the bugs status to confirmed, I guess.
Comment 16 altclava 2018-04-30 19:53:27 UTC
(In reply to rolfofsaxony from comment #15)
> (In reply to altclava from comment #14)
> > I encounter this problem too, in Ubuntu 16.04 and LibreOffice 5.1
> > Is there anything I can do to help to fix it?
> 
> Edit the bugs status to confirmed, I guess.

I can't, I do not have enough privileges to do this.
I am a newbie on his site.
Comment 17 altclava 2018-04-30 20:01:35 UTC
(In reply to rolfofsaxony from comment #15)
> (In reply to altclava from comment #14)
> > I encounter this problem too, in Ubuntu 16.04 and LibreOffice 5.1
> > Is there anything I can do to help to fix it?
> 
> Edit the bugs status to confirmed, I guess.

I can't, I do not have enough privileges to do this.
I am a newbie on his site.(In reply to rolfofsaxony from comment #15)

Upd: I just discovered that my permissions on page https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=permissions
say 
canconfirm 	Can confirm a bug.
But when I press on Status button I do not get option "Confirmed".
Any ideas?
Comment 18 Jean-Baptiste Faure 2018-04-30 20:57:26 UTC
(In reply to altclava from comment #17)
[...]
> But when I press on Status button I do not get option "Confirmed".
> Any ideas?

Confirmed == NEW

Best regards. JBF
Comment 19 moocan 2018-07-06 20:49:53 UTC
Hello,
 
I don't know if it could help somebody.

I tried to installed to install the Grammalecte (https://www.dicollecte.org/) extension as a shared one.

[ A ]

I tried using Justin L suggestion :
  $ LO_EXTENSION_DIR=/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions
  $ sudo unzip -q -d "${LO_EXTENSION_DIR}/${LO_EXTENSION}"  "${LO_EXTENSION}.oxt"

> This did not work for me too !

[ B ]

I tried using unopkg tool
$ sudo unopkg add --shared Grammalecte-fr-v0.6.5.oxt
As reported by rolfofsaxony@gmail.com extension is installed in /var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/*tmpXXXX/Grammalecte-fr-v0.6.5.oxt .
Only root can use it. No standard users can use the extension and the extension is even not loaded  ... no additional menu in my case.
So I moved all created files by unopkg from /libreoffice/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/*tmpXXXX/* to /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions

> This worked well. Extension is listed, and all users can use it. Extension can't be removed by standard users and seen as bundled with LibreOffice.

I tried to understand what are the differences between method [A] and [B]
I compared the crc and content of all files
- All files contained in oxt zip file remains exactly the same using unzip or unopkg
- unopkg tool has created a new properties file named Grammalecte-fr-v0.6.5.oxtproperties which contains properties related to the extension as SUPPRESS_LICENSE=0
I tried to delete this file but the extension is still loaded.
- unopkg created many __pycache__ folders which are cantaining files.
I tried to delete these __pycache__ folders and then the extension is no more loaded.

I tried same method with another extension and I got the same results.
So I don't know why unopkg is doing it works in /var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/...

I don't know if it will work for all extension.
I hope this can help somebody.

Kind Regards
Comment 20 Nicolas Girard 2020-05-29 18:15:38 UTC
For what is worth, I've just installed Grammalecte-fr-v1.9.0.oxt on Ubuntu 20.04 (with LibreOffice 6.4.3) using

  sudo unopkg add -f --suppress-license --shared /tmp/Grammalecte-fr-v1.9.0.oxt

and it went flawlessly ; standard users can use the extension.
Comment 21 rolfofsaxony 2020-05-30 17:19:36 UTC
(In reply to Nicolas Girard from comment #20)
> For what is worth, I've just installed Grammalecte-fr-v1.9.0.oxt on Ubuntu
> 20.04 (with LibreOffice 6.4.3) using
> 
>   sudo unopkg add -f --suppress-license --shared
> /tmp/Grammalecte-fr-v1.9.0.oxt
> 
> and it went flawlessly ; standard users can use the extension.

To be fair it's been so long that I haven't checked it in an age.
I have just checked 2 of my python writer extensions and they can both be installed by the root user for all users, as long as they are packaged to be so.
i.e.
<prop oor:name="URL" oor:type="xs:string">
                        <value>vnd.sun.star.script:bookmarktoggle.oxt|bookmarktoggle|bookmarktoggle.py$BookmarkToggle?language=Python&amp;location=share:uno_packages/cache/uno_packages</value>
</prop>

The key being the "location=share:uno_pac..."
as opposed to     "location=user:uno_pac..."

LibreOffice writer version:
Version: 6.0.7.3
Build ID: 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.10
OS: Linux 4.15; gtk2; 


Time to close this bug.
Comment 22 rolfofsaxony 2020-05-30 17:25:30 UTC
I'm happy to mark this bug as resolved 30/05/2020
I don't know when it got fixed but testing in Version: 6.0.7.3 Build ID: 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.10 it's fine.
Comment 23 Jean-Baptiste Faure 2020-05-30 18:26:30 UTC
(In reply to rolfofsaxony from comment #22)
> I'm happy to mark this bug as resolved 30/05/2020

Thank you very much for re-testing.

> I don't know when it got fixed [...]

So correct status is WorksForMe.

Best regards. JBF