Bug 100629 - [FILEOPEN]: view of formula from files .doc imports not correctly
Summary: [FILEOPEN]: view of formula from files .doc imports not correctly
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 99402
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.0.0.0.beta3
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bibisectRequest, filter:doc, regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-06-26 21:55 UTC by Roman Kuznetsov
Modified: 2016-08-21 17:01 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
file with formula math type in format .doc (19.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2016-06-26 21:55 UTC, Roman Kuznetsov 		Details
OPen file with formula in LO 5.1.3.2 in Xubuntu 16.04 (6.48 KB, image/png)
2016-06-27 18:12 UTC, Roman Kuznetsov 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Roman Kuznetsov 2016-06-26 21:55:46 UTC 
Created attachment 125931 [details]
file with formula math type in format .doc

Subj.

file in attach

see screenshot http://imgur.com/m1KpYoM (left Word, right LibreOffice)

character "SUM" was replaced on "e"
Comment 1 MM 2016-06-26 22:19:51 UTC 
Unconfirmed with v5.1.4.2 under windows 7 x64.
Comment 2 Roman Kuznetsov 2016-06-27 10:21:40 UTC 
(In reply to MM from comment #1)
> Unconfirmed with v5.1.4.2 under windows 7 x64.

In LibreOffice 5.1.3.2, 5.1.4.2, 5.2.0.1 (32 bit) on Windows 7 HB 32 bit - repro

May be need install special font?
Comment 3 Roman Kuznetsov 2016-06-27 18:12:56 UTC 
Created attachment 125947 [details]
OPen file with formula in LO 5.1.3.2 in Xubuntu 16.04

Open file from attach in Xubuntu 16.04 in LO 5.1.3.2. sign of the sum was replaced by a black diamond with a question mark.
hmmm...need install font, really. which font install?!
Comment 4 MM 2016-06-28 21:27:36 UTC 
Still good in v5.1.4.2 under windows 10 x64 no matter which style / font I choose.
But can confirm with v5.1.4.2 & v5.2.0.1 under ubuntu 16.04 x64. With those versions I can see the questionmark.
Comment 5 Roman Kuznetsov 2016-06-29 05:58:00 UTC 
(In reply to MM from comment #4)
> Still good in v5.1.4.2 under windows 10 x64 no matter which style / font I
> choose.
> But can confirm with v5.1.4.2 & v5.2.0.1 under ubuntu 16.04 x64. With those
> versions I can see the questionmark.

i reproduce this bug on Windows 7

OS -> all
Comment 6 MM 2016-06-29 20:47:09 UTC 
Tested some more on mint 17.3 x64.
V4.4.7.2 is still good; broken in v5.0.6.3 and 5.0.0.0.beta3. Set as regression.
Comment 7 Aron Budea 2016-08-19 16:30:11 UTC 
Seems to be very similar to bug 99402. Regression introduced with the same release, too.
Comment 8 Aron Budea 2016-08-21 17:01:16 UTC 
Bibisecting in Linux revealed this to be caused by the same commit as bug 99402.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 99402 ***