Steps: 1) Open attachment 126147 [details] 2) Right-click on shape and click Area in context menu 3) Notice that both autofit and original are checked 4) Compare this with MS word where the image width is 140% and height is 120% Version: 5.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 54f2a4184d1296814e64cfeab1d06ae90d002357 CPU Threads: 2; OS Version: Linux 3.19; UI Render: default; TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@70-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2016-07-08_01:43:14 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
Confirmed. Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Version: 5.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: ab1b351840160655a9f0caedbb35e9fdf203c5a0 CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Linux 4.6; UI Render: default; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group Built on July 16th 2016 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Build ID: 5.1.4.2 Arch Linux build-1 CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Linux 4.6; UI Render: default; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8)
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear Yousuf Philips (jay), To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Compared to Word, Writer still shows a shrunken, shriveled Heiko's head. Tested on Version: 6.5.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 314f15bff08b76bf96acf99141776ef64d2f1355
A fairly simple hack could fix this specific example by scaling down on import to compensate for LO's bitmap stretch. This approach would be brittle, hacky, and lead to scaling artifacts. Bug 95165 would give bitmap fill a proper X,Y + scale feature like MSO uses. With that feature both bugs could be fixed without any loss in image quality caused by unnecessary scaling.
I cannot reproduce with: Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: cb2827f5f65324f309fa0e3c30d0b19ad237410e CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Created attachment 174159 [details] Comparison Word vs Writer This has NOT been fixed. While the behavior has changed in 7.3, it's only different. The core issue of correctly scaling bitmap fills still remains. Heiko has gone from shrunken and shriveled in 6.5 to skinny and stretched in 7.3 If you want a better example of this issue that demonstrates how we are not reading and calculating DOCX scale factors: see attachment 119735 [details] Katka, Please do not mark MSO import/export issues as FIXED without actually comparing them to MSO.
Dear Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired), To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still the same problem as in the comment quoted below Reproduced in Version: 25.2.0.0.alpha0+ (AARCH64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 905e7c1105536c9757fa2c2faf670738aab02595 CPU threads: 8; OS: macOS 15.0; UI render: Skia/Metal; VCL: osx Locale: cs-CZ (cs_CZ.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded > This has NOT been fixed. While the behavior has changed in 7.3, it's only > different. The core issue of correctly scaling bitmap fills still remains. > Heiko has gone from shrunken and shriveled in 6.5 to skinny and stretched in > 7.3 > > If you want a better example of this issue that demonstrates how we are not > reading and calculating DOCX scale factors: see attachment 119735 [details]