LibreOffice 5.1.4 x64, Windows (Tested on Windows Seven) After the uninstallation, these objects are remaining: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly\GAC_64\cli_cppuhelper HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\GACChangeNotification\Default\cli_cppuhelper,1.0.22.0,,ce2cb7e279207b9e,AMD64
Dear Reporter, Could you please try to reproduce it with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ? I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the latest version.
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #1) > Dear Reporter, > Could you please try to reproduce it with the latest version of LibreOffice > from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ? > I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to > 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the latest version. Hello, These problems are still present with "LibreOffice_5.3.0_Win_x64.exe".
For me it was GAC_32 even though I had a 64-bit installation. The folder was modified on the same date I installed 64-bit version 5.3. This is on Win10. Let's set to NEW.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Version: 5.4.6.2 (x64) Build ID: 4014ce260a04f1026ba855d3b8d91541c224eab8 Threads CPU : 4; OS : Windows 6.1; UI Render : par défaut; Locale : fr-FR (fr_FR); Calc: group
Version: 6.2.6.2 (x64) Build ID: 684e730861356e74889dfe6dbddd3562aae2e6ad Threads CPU : 4; OS : Windows 6.1; UI Render : par défaut; VCL: win; Locale : fr-FR (fr_FR); Langue IHM : fr-FR Calc: threaded
In LibreOffice_7.2.0_Win_x64.msi, cli_cppuhelper.dll has been built for amd64, but the MsiAssemblyName table incorrectly claims processorArchitecture=x86. I suspect that the Side-by-Side Assembly API ("Fusion") of Windows installs cli_cppuhelper.dll to GAC_64 because of the content of the file, but when Windows Installer later uninstalls the product, it passes processorArchitecture=x86 to Fusion, which then doesn't find the assembly to uninstall. This may get fixed as part of Bug#144405.
Dear 21Naown, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Is this reproducible with the current version, after tdf#148857 is fixed?
I tested https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86_64@tb77-TDF/2025-01-12_02.27.50/LibreOfficeDev_25.8.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86-64.msi as follows. The test result is that the bug is in this version, too. 1. Started a new Windows Sandbox. 2. Installed Windows SDK 10.0.26100.1742 from https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2286561 On the "Select the features you want to install" page, selected only ".NET Framework 4.8.1 Software Development Kit" (for gacutil) and "MSI Tools" (for ORCA). 3. Verified that the LibreOffice assemblies were not in the GAC yet. CD "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v10.0A\bin\NETFX 4.8.1 Tools\x64" .\gacutil /lr cli_cppuhelper .\gacutil /lr policy.1.0.cli_cppuhelper 4. Downloaded https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86_64@tb77-TDF/2025-01-12_02.27.50/LibreOfficeDev_25.8.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86-64.msi 5. Installed as per https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94265#c22 msiexec /i LibreOfficeDev_25.8.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86-64.msi WRITE_REGISTRY=1 Custom installation. No optional components. Only English (United Kingdom) user interface language. No Microsoft file type associations. No shortcut on desktop. 6. Checked whether the LibreOffice assemblies were now in the GAC. CD "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v10.0A\bin\NETFX 4.8.1 Tools\x64" .\gacutil /lr cli_cppuhelper .\gacutil /lr policy.1.0.cli_cppuhelper Yes, they were. "cli_cppuhelper, Version=1.0.23.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=ce2cb7e279207b9e, processorArchitecture=AMD64" was not referenced by anything, and "policy.1.0.cli_cppuhelper, Version=23.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=ce2cb7e279207b9e, processorArchitecture=x86" was referenced by Windows Installer. 7. Uninstalled LibreOffice. msiexec /x LibreOfficeDev_25.8.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86-64.msi WRITE_REGISTRY=1 I'm not sure whether WRITE_REGISTRY=1 is needed here too. 8. Checked whether the LibreOffice assemblies were still in the GAC. CD "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v10.0A\bin\NETFX 4.8.1 Tools\x64" .\gacutil /lr cli_cppuhelper .\gacutil /lr policy.1.0.cli_cppuhelper The "cli_cppuhelper, Version=1.0.23.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=ce2cb7e279207b9e, processorArchitecture=AMD64" assembly was still in the GAC, and it still wasn't referenced by anything. The "policy.1.0.cli_cppuhelper, Version=23.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=ce2cb7e279207b9e, processorArchitecture=x86" assembly was no longer in the GAC. I did not test "https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86_64@tb78-pollux-TDF_wix/2025-01-12_04.46.10/LibreOfficeDev-25.8.0.0-64.msi". Is the GAC registration expected to be any different in that version?
(In reply to Kalle Niemitalo from comment #11) > I did not test > "https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86_64@tb78-pollux- > TDF_wix/2025-01-12_04.46.10/LibreOfficeDev-25.8.0.0-64.msi". Is the GAC > registration expected to be any different in that version? Thanks a lot for the testing. The wix build is using an experimental WiX-based installer, so you don't have to worry about it.