Created attachment 127406 [details]
Table in custom-shape
The <table:table> element is not allowed as child of a <draw:custom-shape>. For saving in extended ODF1.2 this was fixed in bug 84714 by using a <loext:table> in case of the <table:table> element.
But in case of strict ODF1.2 this invalid element is still written.
In addition this invalid table will be removed when the document is load. That is a bad user experience, because users do not know internals like ODF file format. They only notice, that their table is lost.
How to reproduce: Load the attached document. Set your LibreOffice to save in strict ODF 1.2. Save a copy of the document. Look at the file source to see the invalid table. Reload the "strict ODF1.2"-document to see that the table is lost.
[I'm not sure about the component.]
Used Tools - Options - Load/Save - General - ODF Format version: 1.2.
Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 22.214.171.124.alpha0+
Build ID: 7da2f3ce9f7b049c177a735a146dae84a764d3f7
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.1; UI Render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2016-10-04_03:49:06
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: CL
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.
If you have time, please do the following:
Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
Please DO NOT
Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)
If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/
2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword
Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
The error still exists in Version: 126.96.36.199.alpha1+ (x64)
Build ID: f825e6d4082c0d0beb1c95b881f6a2ee9bfc9161
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win;
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-11-05_00:20:26
Locale: de-DE (en_US); Calc: CL
The enhancement request to allow table in custom-shapes is in https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3761
Reading this one, I wonder if we shouldn't add a dialog indicating that since we use ODF 1.2 strict, some parts of the documents won't be exported so a backup should be made.
Finally, block lines 1099 to 1139 from sw/source/filter/xml/xmltble.cxx should be executed only if we use odf version > 1.2
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #4)
> Reading this one, I wonder if we shouldn't add a dialog indicating that
> since we use ODF 1.2 strict, some parts of the documents won't be exported
> so a backup should be made.
The export to ODF 1.2 strict is only available via Tools > Options. So I assume, that users who switch to strict are advanced users. I think, that an additional dialog is not necessary. There is already the text "! Not using ODF 1.2 Extended may cause information to be lost." This could be extended by a hint to make a backup in 'extended' format. And perhaps a link to detailed information about 'strict' and 'extended'.
There exists the page https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes/List_of_LibreOffice_ODF_Extensions. But that page is currently in such a bad state, that it is not helpful for users and not even helpful for developers. And the help [https://help.libreoffice.org/Common/General_7] has only one example about a feature, which does not exist in 'strict'. Improvement in that area would be a different issue.
> Finally, block lines 1099 to 1139 from sw/source/filter/xml/xmltble.cxx
> should be executed only if we use odf version > 1.2
> Any thoughts?
Why do you think so? The <office:dde-source> element exists already in ODF 1.1.
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #5)
> Why do you think so? The <office:dde-source> element exists already in ODF
You're right, forget my last comment.