Hello, currently 1) F-Droid version of Libreoffice Viewer Beta is completly deprecated 2) Google Play version of Libreoffice Viewer Beta is also deprecated 3) Libreoffice Viewer is up-to-date Could be this fixed? Broken F-Droid version should be replaced by working one. Could this be done?
We don't actively push to F-Droid, no clue how it got there originally but that party would be responsible for keeping everything up to date. Maybe reach out to F-Droid and see what they say. Closing as WONTFIX
I'd like to ask you what about point 2. ? You also don't push to Google Play? Thank you for your opinion for point 1. Would you consider to also maintain F-Droid repository? As far I know, it's only open-source alternative to Google Play and as LibreOffice tend to be also OpenSource based, it would be great state. Also in case of F-Droid, there are two possibilities. 1a) As right now, having version directly version inside F-Droid repository 1b) have own F-Droid repository with LibreOffice, which can be added into F-Droid (same way as in Ubuntu PPA) Thank you for your efford
I also documented state on fdroid bugzilla [1] . [1] https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/issues/529
Hi, F-droid packager here. I'm right now trying to get a working build with the f-droid buildsystem so that an updated version can be made available.
This is going back to NOTOURBUG. Please don't reopen it. I've talked to devs, no we're not going to maintain yet another thing. If the people over at F-Droid want to maintain it, they are welcome to do so, but we're not going to track this on our tracker. Thanks Reason: It's yet more work on our overstretched team.
Joel, this decision is understandable and entirely okay. I've run into some issues with the build system when trying to compile for f-droid, that most likely are bugs with the build system. I'm reporting them so that you can fix them for future versions, so that f-droid doesn't have to apply so much patching in the future. Does that sound like a good idea? Here is the list: Bug 103443 Bug 103442
*** Bug 104548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I asked about this at https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/issues/1443