File import as report in bug 55160 is going backwards
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open attachment 67460 [details] with different LibO versions for example: 18.104.22.168 ; 22.214.171.124 ; 126.96.36.199 ; 188.8.131.52.alpha0+ (bug 55160)
Layout is getting worse
Layout should get better
User Profile Reset: No
File opens relatively OK with:
Build ID: 3215f89-f603614-ab984f2-7348103-1225a5b
But surely not in:
Versie 184.108.40.206 (Bouw-id: 7545bee9c2a0782548772a21bc84a9dcc583b89)
Build ID: 84f2ff67a7e404febf710b1dc7f66d06745c503f
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2016-12-09_23:20:01
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
Created attachment 129489 [details]
Created attachment 129490 [details]
Created attachment 129491 [details]
Created attachment 129492 [details]
Created attachment 129493 [details]
File in MS Word Viewer
Your report is basically a dup from bug 55160.
Why not add some data in that report instead ?!
(In reply to MM from comment #6)
> Your report is basically a dup from bug 55160.
> Why not add some data in that report instead ?!
<Telesto> Is a broken document getting worse also a regression?
<@buovjaga> Telesto: yes, it is worth bibisecting
<Telesto> Should I add it to the existing bug report or create a new one?
<@buovjaga> Telesto: hmm.. that's a tough one. I guess if it's breaking somewhere else than the original report was about, create a new one
<@buovjaga> Telesto: maybe it's best in any case to do a new report as the bibisectrequest would be confusing otherwise
(In reply to Telesto from comment #7)
> (In reply to MM from comment #6)
> > Your report is basically a dup from bug 55160.
> > Why not add some data in that report instead ?!
> <@buovjaga> Telesto: hmm.. that's a tough one. I guess if it's breaking
> somewhere else than the original report was about, create a new one
Could be, but that example isn't broken again, because it's not fixed in the first place. So it can't be a regression.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55160 ***