Bug Hunting Session
Bug 104866 - Let the glyph not be clipped within text line
Summary: Let the glyph not be clipped within text line
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.2.0.0.beta2
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Font-Rendering
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-12-22 16:12 UTC by Volga
Modified: 2017-02-26 15:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Volga 2016-12-22 16:12:07 UTC
Description:
The PRC national standard GB/T 26233-2010 have the following requirement at section 4.3.1:

负的行距能够使蒙古文类文字的竖排行距更小,或者能够部分叠加。负行距的最小绝对值为当前行宽的一半,增量应小一些,并提供透明重叠和剪切重叠选项。

Translation: The minus line height could bring smaller vertical line height for Mongolian like texts, or let some of them overclipped. The minimum absolute value of minus line height is half of current line width, the increment should be smaller, and providing an option for transparent overlapping and clipped overlapping.

Steps to Reproduce:
-

Actual Results:  
-

Expected Results:
To implement this requirement, LibreOffice should let a glyph being overlap within a line even if it is out of ascender/descender, and allow texts overlap each other when they seperate into neighbor lines.


Reproducible: Always

User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/50.0
Comment 1 Volga 2016-12-22 16:22:17 UTC
(In reply to Volga from comment #0)
> Expected Results:
> To implement this requirement, LibreOffice should let a glyph being overlap
> within a line even if it is out of ascender/descender, and allow texts
> overlap each other when they seperate into neighbor lines.

Errata: LibreOffice should ɴᴏᴛ let a glyph being overlap within a line even if it is out of ascender/descender
Comment 2 Buovjaga 2016-12-31 17:45:20 UTC
Sounds fair -> NEW