Description: A specific chart is not copied properly into the clipboard in vector formats. Bitmap is OK. "Save as image..." works correctly (tested EMF and EPS), but this is not a full workaround, as an inserted EMF or EPS image is not rendered so nicely as a chart transferred through the clipboard. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download and open the attached spreadsheet. 2. Go to the "IntSpots" tab. 3. Click on the chart and press Ctrl+C. 4. Create a new presentation. 5. Select Edit > Paste Special. 6. Select "Star Object Descriptor (XML)" or "GDI Metafile" and confirm. Actual Results: Two short curve segments in the bottom right of the chart are missing in the pasted chart. Expected Results: The complete chart should be pasted. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No, but I tried restarting LO. Additional Info: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/56.0.2924.88 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/1.7.735.46
Created attachment 131413 [details] Affected spreadsheet
I have noticed that if the chart is pasted as a Star Object Descriptor (the default), wrong number format is used on the secondary Y axis. Should I file another bug?
Confirmed in Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 880033edde516fc30225005245253293a6a58ba4 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Linux 4.8; UI Render: default; VCL: gtk2; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group and Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 2851ce5afd0f37764cbbc2c2a9a63c7adc844311 Locale: ca_ES unfortunately, the paste action doesn't work in previous versions. Issue not reproducible in LibreOffice 3.5.0 Build ID: d6cde02
I have found a complete workaround: Save chart as StarView Metafile, then insert in the presentation as an image. (SVG also works.)
Resolved, on Ubuntu 17.04 x86_64, in: Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: d5630adf33cc7d30a657e789e2bf0978028e0c1f CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: CL (In reply to Jan Lachnitt from comment #2) > I have noticed that if the chart is pasted as a Star Object Descriptor (the > default), wrong number format is used on the secondary Y axis. Should I file > another bug? Not fixed on my LO version. Should we open a new ticket for this bug and mark this one as resolved?
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
(In reply to Jan Lachnitt from comment #2) > I have noticed that if the chart is pasted as a Star Object Descriptor (the > default), wrong number format is used on the secondary Y axis. Should I file > another bug? Actually the same number format is used (General). However, Calc has some special code to get the necessary precision based on the cell number format. The same can obviously not be implemented for the internal data table. In Impress one needs to use a different number format if one wants to avoid the default 2 decimal places rounding. WHile the behavior might have changed here I think there is nothing we can do.
(In reply to Markus Mohrhard from comment #7) > (In reply to Jan Lachnitt from comment #2) > > I have noticed that if the chart is pasted as a Star Object Descriptor (the > > default), wrong number format is used on the secondary Y axis. Should I file > > another bug? > > Actually the same number format is used (General). However, Calc has some > special code to get the necessary precision based on the cell number format. > The same can obviously not be implemented for the internal data table. In > Impress one needs to use a different number format if one wants to avoid the > default 2 decimal places rounding. > > WHile the behavior might have changed here I think there is nothing we can > do. I'd expect the General number format to have as many decimal places as needed, not just two. I have now also tested the main issue (the missing curve segments) in LO 6.1.3.2 (1:6.1.3~rc2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1). Pasting the chart in the default format (Star Object Descriptor) now correctly reproduces all curve segments, as reported by Dimitri Bouron in Comment 5. However, pasting it as a GDI Metafile still produces the incomplete chart, as I originally reported.