Different results when convert DOCX document to fodt|odt with gui and commandline:
soffice --headless --convert-to "fodt:OpenDocument Text Flat XML" --outdir /home/ji/tmp/break 2pages.docx
In the fodt and odt (content.xml) file, which where converted with the commandline, there are 2 <text:soft-page-break/> breaks instead of 1 and both in the wrong place.
When i save the DOCX document to fodt or odt in the gui, is everything ok.
The DOCX document has 2 pages.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. soffice --headless --convert-to "fodt:OpenDocument Text Flat XML" --outdir YOUR_DIR 2pages.docx
2. xmllint --format 2pages.fodt |grep page-break
soffice --headless --convert-to "fodt:OpenDocument Text Flat XML" --outdir YOUR_DIR 2pages.docx
xmllint --format 2pages.fodt |grep page-break
<text:p text:style-name="Standard"><text:soft-page-break/>Page 1 25</text:p>
<text:p text:style-name="Standard"><text:soft-page-break/>Page 1 51</text:p>
User Profile Reset: No
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/53.0.2785.143 Chrome/53.0.2785.143 Safari/537.36
Created attachment 131905 [details]
Created attachment 131906 [details]
fodt document created with commandline converting
Created attachment 131907 [details]
fodt document created with gui
Repro. Severity minor as gui works.
Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5
Build ID: 5.3.0-2
CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Linux 4.9; UI Render: default; VCL: kde4; Layout Engine: new;
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group
Dear Jan Idzikowski,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.
If you have time, please do the following:
Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
Please DO NOT
Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)
If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/
2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword
Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
Can't repro with Version: 126.96.36.199 (x64)
Build ID: ede20268f3f8777cdf69e0281835d320c41213fc
CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI: en-US
WORKSFORME? Or Linux-specific?
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6)
> Can't repro with Version: 188.8.131.52 (x64)
> Build ID: ede20268f3f8777cdf69e0281835d320c41213fc
> CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL:
> Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI: en-US
> Calc: CL
> WORKSFORME? Or Linux-specific?
Arch Linux 64-bit
Build ID: 09c24681a3414092fde50ec0f617c9f7c79e8a61
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: kf5
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Built on 30 September 2020