Description: The formula's look quite ugly when saving to doc and reopening them in Word or LibreOffice. Opening the math editor (by double clicking the formula) will fix the rendering issue on Word as LibO. Re-saving the file after 'proper' rendering will be permanent in Word (also working for LibO), but not visa versa. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open attached file 2. Save as a new .DOC file 3. Open then new file in Libreoffice Actual Results: Ugly improper rendering of formula's Expected Results: Should look the save as a file saved with Word Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Found in Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 4354f0e9ef4a5538729a2a6f2d1745e247f6c5cd CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-04-21_06:05:57 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL and in Versie: 4.4.6.3 Build ID: e8938fd3328e95dcf59dd64e7facd2c7d67c704d Locale: nl_NL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
Created attachment 132820 [details] Example file
Please attach example screenshot from LO and from Office.
For me formulas are properly rendered. The only issue is with table cells, which are not properly divided
Created attachment 132829 [details] Comparison
Yep, they turn fuzzy after saving to .doc and reloading. Double click and exit fixes the issue. Interestingly no problem in 3.6. Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Version: 5.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 9348b322a5c230dfcc2231661b73e480b130fcd9 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.10; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group Built on April 28th 2016 Arch Linux 64-bit Version 3.6.7.2 (Build ID: e183d5b)
Please check if setting the Environment variable EMF_PLUS_DISALE to 1, resolve that issue.
Just enter in terminal export EMF_PLUS_DISABLE=1 and run LibreOffice from that terminal
(In reply to Bartosz from comment #7) > Just enter in terminal > export EMF_PLUS_DISABLE=1 > and run LibreOffice from that terminal or even simply EMF_PLUS_DISABLE=1 libreoffice Yep, confirm it resolves the issue.
Created attachment 133086 [details] Comparison2 I also can confirm that it looks a lot better with EMF_PLUS_DISABLE. However, I want to note that there is still noticeable difference between re-rendering a formula (by entering/exiting the formula editor) and EMF_PLUS_DISABLE. The formula symbols are smaller and bit super-scripted. The font rendering is also different (less spacing, especially the equals sign)
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Bibisected on Linux with 50max to https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/plugins/gitiles/core/+/d53103dd83bf20ac63485e229069f145e35b3009%5E!/ fdo#74124 bilinear scaling with blending for some formats Adding Cc: to Tomaž Vajngerl
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
With the latest Libreoffice the formulas are displayed correctly.