Steps: 1. Open attachment 131189 [details] in Writer 2. Insert a footnote and notice that a. footnote text is set to 12pt as Footnote paragraph style is empty b. footnote number isnt superscript in Footnote Characters character style c. there is no space between footnote number and text 3. Open attachment 131189 [details] in Word 4. Insert a footnote and notice that a. footnote text is set to 10pt in Footnote Text paragraph style b. footnote number is superscript in Footnote Reference character style c. there is a space (U+20) between the footnote number and text The issue is that 'footnote text' paragraph style and 'footnote reference' character styles arent defined in styles.xml. Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 1f4d7fc8618828222d7f4447daed4c3361edeea6 CPU threads: 2; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
Repro with document. Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: f808c50c6eece87d515df3b84b1c774395b5d9bc CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.11; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group Built on June 26th 2017
see bug 53175's fix from Cédric Bosdonnat 2012-08-20 09:29:29 (GMT) commit b95d203bc17c83ec0fe5139f519d53ed1d842d3a (patch) fdo#53175: Don't load the default values of the styles in writerfilter ...or we may have some additional properties set on some styles.
proposed fix: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/41546 This doesn't fix (b) footnote number isn't superscript. That is because it isn't superscript by default in LibreOffice itself.
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c071e5f6858661881065cbb4e644c37c8e94ccc6 tdf#108765 DOCX: after import, allow default styles again It will be available in 6.0.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
requested backport to 5.4
(In reply to Justin L from comment #3) > This doesn't fix (b) footnote number isn't superscript. That is because it > isn't superscript by default in LibreOffice itself. LO doesnt default to use supserscript, but MSO does and that is what this bug is supposed accomplish, mimicking how it looks in MSO.
Created attachment 136026 [details] MSO vs LO Here is how an inserted footnote looks in MSO vs LO (with your latest patch).
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-5-4": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=adce43a12a9e9b3834e188ea0deb4af8d28a2d06&h=libreoffice-5-4 tdf#108765 DOCX: after import, allow default styles again It will be available in 5.4.2. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
A polite ping to Justin Luth: is this bug fixed? if so, could you please close it as RESOLVED FIXED ? Thanks
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #9) > A polite ping to Justin Luth: is this bug fixed? if so, could you please > close it as RESOLVED FIXED ? Thanks According to comment 6, this is not fixed. "LO doesn't default to use supserscript, but MSO does and that is what this bug is supposed accomplish, mimicking how it looks in MSO." I have already unassigned myself - it is still an open bug.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired), To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
*** Bug 138625 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***