Bug 112230 - FILESAVE: ODT: Deleted changes are moved to the top after RT
Summary: FILESAVE: ODT: Deleted changes are moved to the top after RT
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
3.5 all versions
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bibisected, filter:doc, regression
Depends on:
Blocks: DOC-Track-Changes
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-09-05 11:36 UTC by Xisco Faulí
Modified: 2026-02-24 03:13 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
sample (187.00 KB, application/msword)
2017-09-05 11:36 UTC, Xisco Faulí
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Xisco Faulí 2017-09-05 11:36:01 UTC
Created attachment 136028 [details]
sample

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open attached document
2. Save it to ODT
3. Reopen it

Observed behaviour: The deleted text is on top of the document

Reproduced in

Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 04d70c0999c716f5465631eca50945915ec607c4
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.10; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; 
Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group
Comment 2 Telesto 2017-09-05 18:03:26 UTC
Repro with:
Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: fc61be93c60967bf1d6bcffcada8189016d4530e
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.29; UI render: default; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-09-04_23:40:52
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
Comment 3 QA Administrators 2018-09-06 02:59:43 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Xisco Faulí 2019-06-27 10:04:24 UTC
Still reproducible in

Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: ea19b0c0230fcc730245ecd445c03164cb6a1d18
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; 
Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded

@László Németh, I thought you might be interested in this issue...
Comment 5 QA Administrators 2021-06-27 04:19:27 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 6 Xisco Faulí 2021-07-07 13:26:28 UTC
Still reproducible in

Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: eac5977bfc11797eda356560a5e45c51108ef5a1
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
Comment 7 BogdanB 2023-05-12 16:11:19 UTC
Also in
Version: 7.5.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 9f56dff12ba03b9acd7730a5a481eea045e468f3
CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
Comment 8 Kevin Suo 2024-02-23 06:54:21 UTC
Reproduced on
Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 43f49c3b50b406f0334085dcf302180718f3ecb3
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN.UTF-8); UI: zh-CN
Calc: threaded
Comment 9 Kevin Suo 2024-02-23 11:18:50 UTC
Xisco Faulí:

Same as my comment in bug 117604,  when I am doing bisecting from source, I find that the bibisect range seams to be not correct. Bug exists on commit 02d03eb4ad6e64744659c5fe04282b25b66c28d8 (i.e. the first bad commit identified by bibisect), but the bug also exists on commit 9ae9b2f665b3caa9cc584512c26dfa899e1d2d45 (i.e. its parent commit), even if I do "make clean" for each build.

Would you please rerun the bibisect of you still have the 4.2 bibisect repo? I remove bibisected keyword and add bibisectRequest instead.
Comment 10 Xisco Faulí 2024-02-23 11:40:11 UTC
Unfortunately I don't have that repo anymore
Comment 11 raal 2024-02-23 19:44:43 UTC
I can reproduce the bug with oldest commit in linux bibisect-41max repo.
Comment 13 Kevin Suo 2024-02-24 09:06:11 UTC
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #12)
Thank you for the updated bibisecting. Based on the new range, I set the version to 3.5.
Comment 14 QA Administrators 2026-02-24 03:13:36 UTC
Dear Xisco Faulí,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug