Created attachment 136028 [details] sample Steps to reproduce: 1. Open attached document 2. Save it to ODT 3. Reopen it Observed behaviour: The deleted text is on top of the document Reproduced in Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 04d70c0999c716f5465631eca50945915ec607c4 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.10; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group
Regression introduced in range https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=9ae9b2f665b3caa9cc584512c26dfa899e1d2d45..6874228b090b9d910651ddf6ec82b16ac9ecb6de
Repro with: Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: fc61be93c60967bf1d6bcffcada8189016d4530e CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.29; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-09-04_23:40:52 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still reproducible in Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: ea19b0c0230fcc730245ecd445c03164cb6a1d18 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded @László Németh, I thought you might be interested in this issue...
Dear Xisco Faulí, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still reproducible in Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: eac5977bfc11797eda356560a5e45c51108ef5a1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Also in Version: 7.5.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 9f56dff12ba03b9acd7730a5a481eea045e468f3 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Reproduced on Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 43f49c3b50b406f0334085dcf302180718f3ecb3 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN.UTF-8); UI: zh-CN Calc: threaded
Xisco Faulí: Same as my comment in bug 117604, when I am doing bisecting from source, I find that the bibisect range seams to be not correct. Bug exists on commit 02d03eb4ad6e64744659c5fe04282b25b66c28d8 (i.e. the first bad commit identified by bibisect), but the bug also exists on commit 9ae9b2f665b3caa9cc584512c26dfa899e1d2d45 (i.e. its parent commit), even if I do "make clean" for each build. Would you please rerun the bibisect of you still have the 4.2 bibisect repo? I remove bibisected keyword and add bibisectRequest instead.
Unfortunately I don't have that repo anymore
I can reproduce the bug with oldest commit in linux bibisect-41max repo.
I got the following range as result when using bibisect-43all: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=003973f5d461b981737946456eb08b2b7d60f150..d6f2418d0828ec4275355502ae3f87c80e16e8f5
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #12) Thank you for the updated bibisecting. Based on the new range, I set the version to 3.5.