Bug 112570 - much slower than previous versions + a crash when changing printer properties
Summary: much slower than previous versions + a crash when changing printer properties
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 108574
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
(earliest affected) release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
Depends on:
Reported: 2017-09-22 12:03 UTC by David Edwards
Modified: 2017-09-22 15:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Edwards 2017-09-22 12:03:40 UTC
Not really a bug (I think) but performance degradation that makes 5.3.6 unusable for me:

I have a large Calc file for music files (over 23000 lines) and scrolling became impossibly slow with 5.3.6 - such that it was all but impossible to find a specific line. Also text copied from an email into a Writer document, visible on screen, did not print and when I went to check printer settings LibreOffice crashed and crashed again on restart, losing the document. I have had to downgrade (to and immediately I can use the big Calc file again. I have a laptop with a dual core i3 processor - not the fastest around but adequate for everything else I do including live streaming of concerts etc. It runs Windows 10 64 bit. You seem to have made 5.3.6 unnecessarily heavy.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Load 5.3.6 on my computer.

Actual Results:  
described above

Expected Results:
Large Calc files become impossibly slow to scroll to nearly unusable.

Reproducible: Always

User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.90 Safari/537.36 OPR/47.0.2631.80
Comment 1 Timur 2017-09-22 15:45:15 UTC
Many bugs on that. 108574 is one of them.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108574 ***
Comment 2 Timur 2017-09-22 15:46:13 UTC
Or it's maybe Bug 107355. Whatever, I suppose it's a duplicate.