Created attachment 136688 [details] Screenshot: comparison of Futura-Book in Writer, LibO 5.1 and 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Due to bug 112558 comment 10 I report the bad behavior of proprietary font "Futura-Book" since activating of the new harfbuzz rendering. Attachment 136522 [details] (screenshot of Calc-Writer font comparison) and attachment 136523 [details] (zip archive with resources for Calc-Writer font comparison) shows the bug in comparison to other fonts. I'll attach a new screenshot and the odt file. If there is a question because of the font itself as I'm not allowed to insert it in the file, please ask me privately. The example shows the "Futura-Book" font and 12pt font size: * Default paragraph style with single line spacing. * Text Body with 120 % proportional line spacing. * Heading 5 with single line spacing (not in the screenshot). * Caption paragraph style with single line spacing. * Endnote with single line spacing. (All default attributes without a user change.) All lines but the last in a paragraph only are readable with line spacing options * Double line spacing, * At least 12 pt * Leading 6 pt * Fixed 13 pt
Created attachment 136689 [details] Example file with Futura-Book and some paragraph styles
At a first glance, it looks like similar to bug 107605 or bug 107888. @Khaled, could you please confirm ?
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #2) > At a first glance, it looks like similar to bug 107605 or bug 107888. > @Khaled, could you please confirm ? Probably yes, can’t be sure without checking the font itself.
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #3) > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #2) > > At a first glance, it looks like similar to bug 107605 or bug 107888. > > @Khaled, could you please confirm ? > > Probably yes, can’t be sure without checking the font itself. Is there any place where it's explained how to check it ?
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4) > (In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #3) > > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #2) > > > At a first glance, it looks like similar to bug 107605 or bug 107888. > > > @Khaled, could you please confirm ? > > > > Probably yes, can’t be sure without checking the font itself. > > Is there any place where it's explained how to check it ? AFAIK, no. But if one has access to the font and can install fonttools, executing `ttx -t hhea -t OS/2 font.ttf` and attaching the output here should be enough.
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #5) > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4) > > (In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #2) > > > > At a first glance, it looks like similar to bug 107605 or bug 107888. > > > > @Khaled, could you please confirm ? > > > > > > Probably yes, can’t be sure without checking the font itself. > > > > Is there any place where it's explained how to check it ? > > AFAIK, no. But if one has access to the font and can install fonttools, > executing `ttx -t hhea -t OS/2 font.ttf` and attaching the output here > should be enough. @Thomas, since you have the font, could you please give it a try ?
Created attachment 136746 [details] fonttools output for Futura-Book.ttf Thanks, Khaled and Xisco. Attached you'll find the output file.
(In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #7) > Created attachment 136746 [details] > fonttools output for Futura-Book.ttf > > Thanks, Khaled and Xisco. Attached you'll find the output file. @Khaled, could you please take a look ?
Should be fixed with the same fix for bug 107605. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 107605 ***