Created attachment 137240 [details] Hybrid PDF embedding original ODS document (which exhibits the described bug) This bug has already been reported as #99859, but I've been asked to open a new one. Attached is an LO-generated "Hybrid" PDF which has the original ODS document embedded. ----------- If you (like some bug handlers in the other bug previously) don't know how to extract the ODS from the Hybrid PDF, here's how: 1. Open Hybrid PDF with LibreOffice. 2. Save it again -- but please use "Save As..." ----------- Now you should have both files: - The original ODS. - A PDF which has the original ODS embedded. This can be opened by any standard PDF viewer. But it also can be opened by LibreOffice by silently extracting the ODS (while still pretending to the user to edit the PDF). The ODS exhibits several problems with LibreOffice's handling of transparencies, when comparing three different views: 1. View of exported PDF (which is the same as a printout on paper would look). 2. Normal document view. 3. Print preview. (Ignore the font color mismatch, which is in the big headline of the 1st sheet (font color is defined as yellow, but document view displays it as black) -- this part of the problem seems now to be tracked via bug #99859.) However, look the second and third charts in all three views mentioned above. You'll see several artefacts in the print preview, while the PDF export looks perfectly good. If you investigate the document in detail, you'll find that (some) embedded charts use transparency value of 35% for the trend lines. Setting that transparency to 0% removes the weird artefacts from the preview. Scope of this bug: # Users looking at the print preview only may never try to actually export to PDF # or send the job to the printer, but instead fiddle hours and hours with their # document in order to "get it right". It can lead to a lot of time wastage -- # even for people who know that the end result is good, they'll have to jump # through hoops of repeatedly exporting to PDF first for a good fidelity print # preview, before they send the file to the printer. I noticed this first with LO v5.1.2.2 on macOS. It is still here with my current version: Version: 5.4.2.2 Build ID: 22b09f6418e8c2d508a9eaf86b2399209b0990f4 CPU threads: 8; OS: Mac OS X 10.12.6; UI render: default; Locale: de-DE (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
Created attachment 137241 [details] Side by side comparison of: (1) original document view (left); (2) PDF or print output (center); (3) print preview (right) Side by side comparison of: (1) left: original document (editing) view; (2) center: PDF or print output -- this is intended "look" of document; (3) right: print preview. Ignore the font color differences in the red box of the top chart -- this is already tracked in bug #99859. What's relevant for this bug is the third chart, where the transparency setting (35%) for the trend line causes the chart in the preview to be intersected with the table.
(In reply to kurt.pfeifle from comment #1) > Created attachment 137241 [details] > Side by side comparison of: (1) original document view (left); (2) PDF or > print output (center); (3) print preview (right) > > Side by side comparison of: > > (1) left: original document (editing) view; > (2) center: PDF or print output -- this is intended "look" of document; > (3) right: print preview. > > Ignore the font color differences in the red box of the top chart -- this is > already tracked in bug #99859. > > What's relevant for this bug is the third chart, where the transparency > setting (35%) for the trend line causes the chart in the preview to be > intersected with the table. Confirmed, but only on macOS (10.12.6). LibreOffice 5.4.3.2 No problem on Linux or Windows. Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Version: 5.4.2.2.0+ Build ID: 5.4.2-2 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.13; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group Win 10 Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) Build ID: 4058d85963e371be657f531d8f30e31381a9ccab CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-11-05_22:51:05 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #2) > (In reply to kurt.pfeifle from comment #1) > > What's relevant for this bug is the third chart, where the transparency > > setting (35%) for the trend line causes the chart in the preview to be > > intersected with the table. > > Confirmed, but only on macOS (10.12.6). LibreOffice 5.4.3.2 Finally... *sigh*
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear kurt.pfeifle, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear kurt.pfeifle, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Created attachment 186059 [details] Print preview in 7.5 So I assume the second PDF in the center is from Preview? Preview does not seem to render all the grid lines consistently between zoom-levels. But Firefox PDF viewer does, so that would rather be a Preview bug. However, the print-preview has strange rendering artifacts so we can keep this open Version: 7.5.1.2 (AARCH64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: fcbaee479e84c6cd81291587d2ee68cba099e129 CPU threads: 10; OS: Mac OS X 13.2.1; UI render: default; VCL: osx Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded