Description: Application colors don't seem to work as expected in DOCX files. Steps to Reproduce: 1. In "Application colors" (Tools->Options->LibreOffice->Application Colors), choose a color (eg grey, but can be anything but white) for the document background. 2. Open the DOCX file (try with the test DOCX file I uploaded) Actual Results: In my screen I see the text background area as white (ie not the color chosen as document background in Application Colors) Expected Results: I would expect to see the background of the document in grey color (or whatever color you chose as Document Background) instead of white. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: It works well with ODT files (and maybe other formats). I attach two files: the DOCX test and the PDF to check that it prints with correct colors. Version: 5.4.4.2 Build ID: 1:5.4.4~rc2-0ubuntu0.14.04.1~lo1.1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
Created attachment 139217 [details] test DOCX file
Created attachment 139218 [details] just checking the colors are OK when printing to PDF
Tried to reproduce. Result: Background outside margins shows application colour; Background within margins is still white. J22Gim, do you get the same result? Version: 5.4.4.2 (x64) Build-ID: 2524958677847fb3bb44820e40380acbe820f960 CPU-Threads: 4; BS: Windows 6.19; UI-Render: Standard; Gebietsschema: de-DE (de_DE); Calc: group
Yes, exactly like you describe. You can see it in the attached PDF (*) (*) https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=139218
Set to NEW, because of comment 3 and 4.
Confirmed also with Version: 6.0.1.1 Build ID: 60bfb1526849283ce2491346ed2aa51c465abfe6 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
any news about this?
Dear J22Gim, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still reproducible today. Version: 6.4.3.2 Build ID: libreoffice-6.4.3.2-snap1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.3; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
still the same in Version: 7.0.2.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Ubuntu package version: 1:7.0.2_rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 Calc: threaded
Created attachment 167607 [details] Screenshot of the example file and another example in current Writer In current master this works with a new document: Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: cb084f475db33a2cfc62bc9c8de37b8c3c87b3c7 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU); UI: en-US Calc: CL Also the example file has color (white) background set in the page properties. Unsetting that to "None" background restores the desired effect.
Created attachment 167608 [details] Simple example file made with 5.4 and custom application color This simple example file demostrates that even 5.4 did the right thing: using the default "None" page background area fill generates the desired effect.
Created attachment 167609 [details] The second example with custom application color in Writer and default in Word In Writer my setting causes the whole page to have a green color, while the default is retained in Word.
Created attachment 167610 [details] Document background vs page background in 5.4 and 7.2alpha Also the opposite setting works now correctly: If you set a non-white document background in Options and a white background in the page settings, then the page background has not covered the margins (unlike in Word). This changed with bug #112195.
With all that said, I can't reproduce any incorrect behavior.