Created attachment 140038 [details]
ODT file that shows mangled index entry after Update->All
The attached ODT document illustrates the bug.
If an alphabetical index entry is placed in the text, prior to some text that is superscripted and/or italicized, the index entry itself gets mangled in various ways (after Update->All). Then mangled entry is often partially italicized, partially superscripted, and sometimes has unreadable characters.
The following text shows the relative placement of the index entry, and the italicized text with superscripts.
1. [index entry here]John Doe [italic text with superscripts]
As explained in the attached ODT document, the problem did not exist in 184.108.40.206, but does appear in 220.127.116.11, and in the latest release 18.104.22.168.
Looks as reported in master 61+ and started in 5.4.0.
Prior versions also show italic on attachment fileopen but it's corrected after update index or Tools->Update->All and can be properly saved.
Seems to be win only.
I can't reproduce it in
ID de la construcció: 1:6.1.2~rc1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
Fils de CPU: 4; SO: Linux 4.15; Renderitzador de la IU: per defecte; VCL: x11;
Configuració local: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group threaded
but I do in
Id. de compilación: 65905a128db06ba48db947242809d14d3f9a93fe
Subprocs. CPU: 1; SO: Windows 6.1; Repres. IU: predet.;
Configuración regional: es-ES (es_ES); Calc: group threaded
I can't reproduce it in
Build ID: 425af6845ebe066c950b0b63f50563e067485f3e
CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; VCL: win;
Locale: en-GB (en_GB); Calc: threaded
In a large chronological journal document I prepared with V22.214.171.124, I found that when I started my text file entry with a superscripted date (as in "1st" or 2nd), the index entry for any indexed text that follows the superscripted number has superscripts part way along the entry in the index.
After some significant work, I removed the superscript from the numbers at the beginning of each line and voila, the problem disappeared. However, to be fair, I shouldn't have had to do that.
Created attachment 148246 [details]
Example ODT file shows corrupted index entry
I think this is the same bug. In my case the index entry is placed after some text that includes a superscript and subscript (for demonstration purposes).
The index entry ends up with the same superscript or subscript in the positions from the original text.
In the attached example,
* The superscript “1” is at position 5, and causes the “y” in “entry” to be a superscript.
* The subscript “2” is at position 8, and causes the “e” in “text” to be a subscript.