No heading numbering for the second RTF-paste
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open attachment 143425 [details]
2. CTRL+A + CTRL+C
3. Open a new document
4. Special Paste RTF the content 2 times -> No heading numbering for the second paste
No heading numbering for the second paste
Heading numbering should continue
User Profile Reset: No
Build ID: bb1d5780226bb1b9156580972eea9aa849178742
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-07-03_05:56:48
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600
I guess there are 2 issues here:
- paste with numbering - which may be a regression because OO worked but there were changes during time how RTF paste worked this bug)
- continue numbering - which never worked.
Also reproduced in
Version 18.104.22.168.alpha0+ (Build ID: efca6f15609322f62a35619619a6d5fe5c9bd5a)
@Miklos, I thought you could be interested in this issue...
Not reproduced in
Working on debian-buster in the daily Linux dbgutil bibisect
repository, I see that the pasted text has continued numbering in both
version 2018-08-15 and 2018-07-03. The latter is:
Build ID: 5fce97a58b8f764e35bf98128591c9a89537da05
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.17; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3;
Locale: en-CA (en_CA.utf8); Calc: group threaded
Is this perhaps a Window-only bug?
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.
If you have time, please do the following:
Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
Please DO NOT
Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)
If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/
2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword
Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
Created attachment 154866 [details]
Demo compared in OO LO3.3 LO6.2 LO64+
This was marked regression, probably due to worse paste.
Now in 6.4+ we are back as it was in OO. And that means first issue is resolved.
But it's not OK, numbering doesn't continue in RTF paste, unlike simple paste.
So let's convert this bug to continuous numbering.