Created attachment 143742 [details]
Word doc with table in text box
Have some old Word doc templates with basic text boxes with a simple table in them, where Writer messes up the formatting and moves the table to a separate page
Tested 6.0 - 6.0.6RC as well as 6.1RC on Windows, 32 and 64 bit.
Hi Rodney, thank you for reporting the bug. Can you add a PDF that shows the correct layout?
I can confirm with Version: 18.104.22.168.alpha0+
Build ID: ea59fc4831b9d2430de51faa8c3e0a24e6d90cd1
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3;
regression, in 4.1 it's not exactly the same as in word, but table is inside the textbox.
Created attachment 144121 [details]
printscreen from word2010
Created attachment 144214 [details]
bibisect in 44max repo, tail of terminal output
Working on debian-buster in 44max bibisect repository, I see that the
bug entered LibreOffice in
Author: Luboš Luňák <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AuthorDate: Mon Jul 21 10:56:52 2014 +0200
Commit: Luboš Luňák <email@example.com>
CommitDate: Mon Jul 21 11:02:04 2014 +0200
ww8import create a pagedesc if continuous section changes margins (bnc#875383)
This is similar to what writerfilter does. MSWord can have one page with several
different margins, which are saved using continuous sections, which causes all
kinds of trouble, because either we treat them as Writer sections, which means
we lose some of the data, or we treat them as Writer page styles, which causes
spurious page breaks if in the wrong place. Either option has its problems, but
here it seems slightly better to go for keeping the data and hoping the page
break will be in a place where a break will be anyway.
I was able to get a stable result from bibisect only by creating a new
user profile at each step. I would welcome thoughts about why this
might be necessary.
Seeing "either option has its problems" in the log message, I wonder
if this bug is one we can fix.
I am setting keywords bibisected, bisected.
(In reply to Terrence Enger from comment #5)
> I was able to get a stable result from bibisect only by creating a new
> user profile at each step. I would welcome thoughts about why this
> might be necessary.
Happens sometimes, perhaps some compat option was added that had an impact on it.
I tested with 6.2beta1 and see this bug is still here. Is this something that can get hammered out? Anything else you need me to test or provide?
cc: Lubos Lunak, because of bibisect result in comment 5
Closing as a dupe of bug 87764
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87764 ***