Bug 121137 - Numbering instruction integration program
Summary: Numbering instruction integration program
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
6.1.1.1 rc
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-11-03 06:05 UTC by 00
Modified: 2019-02-22 07:19 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
1 (51.29 KB, image/png)
2018-11-03 06:07 UTC, 00
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description 00 2018-11-03 06:05:52 UTC
Description:
Because it has been "innovative", in the "custom", there will be more and more instructions, and when there are too many instructions, it needs to be integrated.



Assumption:
The first generation command is the beginning of A, and the "numbering command" has A-01 and A-02.
The second generation instruction is the beginning of B, and the "numbering instruction" has B-01.

Since A-01 and A-02 are the same commands, it is integrated as long as A-01 and A-02 are replaced by B-01.

In conclusion, you can do this by writing a "numbering instruction integration program".



Note:
1, numbering instructions, there is also a function that is convenient for communication.
2, this idea, I am not sure that it can be implemented, put forward for your reference.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Comment 1 00 2018-11-03 06:07:59 UTC
Created attachment 146262 [details]
1
Comment 2 Xisco Faulí 2019-01-15 14:58:11 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 3 00 2019-01-15 15:12:22 UTC
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #2)
> Thank you for reporting the bug.
> Unfortunately without clear steps to reproduce it, we cannot track down the
> origin of the problem.
> Please provide a clearer set of step-by-step instructions on how to
> reproduce the problem.
> I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to
> 'UNCONFIRMED' once the steps are provided

This is not a problem
This is just an integrated recommendation
Comment 4 Xisco Faulí 2019-01-15 15:20:44 UTC
(In reply to 和尚蟹 from comment #3)
> (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #2)
> > Thank you for reporting the bug.
> > Unfortunately without clear steps to reproduce it, we cannot track down the
> > origin of the problem.
> > Please provide a clearer set of step-by-step instructions on how to
> > reproduce the problem.
> > I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to
> > 'UNCONFIRMED' once the steps are provided
> 
> This is not a problem
> This is just an integrated recommendation

and what is the recommendation? please elaborate...
Comment 5 00 2019-01-15 15:25:28 UTC
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4)

> and what is the recommendation? please elaborate...

It is the "integration directive."
Comment 6 Xisco Faulí 2019-01-15 15:26:31 UTC
(In reply to 和尚蟹 from comment #5)
> (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4)
> 
> > and what is the recommendation? please elaborate...
> 
> It is the "integration directive."

What is the "integration directive" ?
Comment 7 00 2019-02-21 15:27:04 UTC
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #6)

> What is the "integration directive" ?

It is to integrate multiple instructions of the "toolbar" into one.
Comment 8 00 2019-02-22 07:18:26 UTC
Because deleting the "command" causes the "tool column command" to display an error, the user deletes the "tool column command" and can achieve the same function, so the article is closed.