Description: If the document contains a shape with textbox, the .doc file will be corrupted. The opening process of the MS Word results malformed shape. Shape and textbox will be separated. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Insert a shape. 2. Add a textbox to the shape. Write something in the textbox. (Shape-Textbox.odt, Shape-TextBox.PNG) 3. Save the document into .doc format. (Shape-Textbox.doc) 4. Open the .doc file with MS Word. (Shape-Textbox-Export.PNG) Actual Results: The shape appear beside the frame. The shape is malformed. The MS Word appears error message. Expected Results: The shape remains in the original place. The width and height of the shape does not modify. The .doc file is not corrupted. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info:
Created attachment 146748 [details] The original file saved by Writer
Created attachment 146749 [details] Example file from Writer – corrupted
Created attachment 146750 [details] Screenshot of the original document in Writer
Created attachment 146751 [details] Screenshot of the exported document in Word
Confirm with .2. Works in 4.4 - shape is not perfect, but no error in Word. Marking as regression.
bibisected to range http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=67be577f163831e460e19aee958bdcf7187b8a56..22ca3bf1b9dedec65a57ac70a124bf69cd242e0e This seems to have begun at the below commit. Adding Cc: to Miklos Vajna; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks author Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk> 2014-10-04 19:37:55 +0200 committer Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk> 2014-10-04 20:18:01 +0200 commit 9835a5823e0f559aabbc0e15ea126c82229c4bc7 (patch) tree 12b77a17bf437e248ef02cc06634ab1dc458a99c parent ad5e8b30ac66a00d0110fcdaf4d064181247585b (diff) sw textboxes: reimplement ODF import/export
The DOC export is simply not aware of the textbox feature. The above commit is just the first one that starts to handle the ODF markup of the bugdoc (for a short period of time, there was an older ODF markup for this feature), uncovering an already existing problem. So this is not a regression, simply support for the textbox feature has to be implemented in the DOC filter. Although of course: yes, this is a problem, and yes, it would make sense to address it.
Dear NISZ LibreOffice Team, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear NISZ LibreOffice Team, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
repro 24.2+