Description: In cells with the formula =cell/100 ist the solution 0 /10 works correkt, /1000 works correct, also /1000*10 works correct. 6.13.2 (x64) and 6.2.0 (x64) Version In Version 6.0.7.3 (x64) everything is OK Steps to Reproduce: 1.For example A1 is 500. B1 is =A1/100 Actual Results: B1 is 0! Expected Results: B1 should be 5 Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info:
Hello, Thank you for filing the bug. Please send us a sample document, as this makes it easier for us to verify the bug. I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO', so please do change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once you have attached a document. (Please note that the attachment will be public, remove any sensitive information before attaching it.) How can I eliminate confidential data from a sample document? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FAQ#How_can_I_eliminate_confidential_data_from_a_sample_document.3F Thank you
no repro in lunix Version: 6.1.2.1 Build ID: 65905a128db06ba48db947242809d14d3f9a93fe CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: en-GB (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group threaded Version: 6.1.4.0.0+ Build ID: b3af23568f9b9b444ae09f2a1ab4a61d212b422a CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@70-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-6-1, Time: 2018-11-23_09:38:29 Locale: nl-BE (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group threaded
(In reply to Uwe Hartwig from comment #0) > Description: > In cells with the formula =cell/100 ist the solution 0 > /10 works correkt, /1000 works correct, also /1000*10 works correct. > > > 6.13.2 (x64) and 6.2.0 (x64) Version > > In Version 6.0.7.3 (x64) everything is OK > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1.For example > > A1 is 500. B1 is =A1/100 > > Actual Results: > B1 is 0! > > Expected Results: > B1 should be 5 > > > Reproducible: Always > > > User Profile Reset: No > > > > Additional Info: I checked this again January, 13th 2019: First from actual 6.0.7.3 installed 6.1.4 -> Test /100 works allright. After that installed same Version 6.2.00 beta 1 from HDD as reported. The problem is not reproductible?! Everything OK ;-)