Created attachment 147279 [details]
Two of the three date forms in the attached documents are not editable in Writer but they can be edited in MS application.
This bug was filled by fact based on discussion in the bug121203.
Thank you for reporting the bug. Unfortunately I can't reproduce in
Build ID: 86daf60bf00efa86ad547e59e09d6bb77c699acb
CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 6.1; UI render: default;
Locale: en-US (en_US); Calc: group threaded
(In reply to Durgapriyanka from comment #1)
> Thank you for reporting the bug. Unfortunately I can't reproduce in
> Version: 18.104.22.168
The bug I was mentioning in the report was fixed and since the fix is available (version 6.2 beta), from that version I am not able to see forms, I was able to see them in previous versions as well.
Confirmed. The root of the problem is that the docx file has some free-form date strings: something our date control doesn't support, as far as I see.
Does Writer use the number formatter/scanner there for parsing dates?
Asking because that can handle a 17-Oct-2018 date as value but apparently not combined as date+time 17-Oct-2018 09:00
Would it help if it did? (it's unclear to me what then should happen with such a combined value but that would be a problem of Writer then ;-)
Also reproduced in
Version 22.214.171.124.alpha0+ (Build ID: efca6f15609322f62a35619619a6d5fe5c9bd5a)
Created attachment 159159 [details]
Screenshot of the example document in 6.4
This got fixed in:
Verzió: 126.96.36.199 (x86)
Build az.: b0a288ab3d2d4774cb44b62f04d5d28733ac6df8
CPU szálak: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; Felületmegjelenítés: alapértelmezett; VCL: win;
Területi beállítások: hu-HU (hu_HU); Felület nyelve: hu-HU
Created attachment 159160 [details]
The example document saved by current master
After changing and saving it works even in Word.
The fields started to be editable in:
author Tamás Zolnai <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2019-07-10 18:22:31 +0200
committer Tamás Zolnai <email@example.com> 2019-07-12 12:55:40 +0200
summary: MSForms: Rework text-based date form field's representation
Thanks for fixing this Tamás!