Description: When you make a conditional formatting with cell contains a number with a “,” symbol (eg.: 1,23) it doesn’t work when opened in LO. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a new xlsx in LO. 2. Create a new rule in conditional formatting. 3. Set its condition to contains given text and set the text to 1,23 4. Write some numbers to the area some of which contain the number and notice that the formatting works. 5. Save the file and open it in LO. 6. Notice the differences then write into one of the are this: “1,23” with the “ symbols. Actual Results: In LO the formatting only works when “1,23” is in the cell. Expected Results: It should work as it does in MSO so with both 1,23 and “1,23”. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info:
Created attachment 147527 [details] The original document.
Created attachment 147528 [details] Screenshot of the original document side by side in Excel and Calc.
confirm in Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 3c964980da07892a02d5ac721d80558c459532d0 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.1; UI render: default; VCL: win; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-12-12_02:07:45 Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded in Excel condition is "Text contains 1,23". Do you see? TEXT. There isn't the same condition in Calc
Also reproduced in Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 3ca42d8d51174010d5e8a32b96e9b4c0b3730a53 Threads 4; Ver: 4.15; Render: default; and Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: efca6f15609322f62a35619619a6d5fe5c9bd5a)
Dear NISZ LibreOffice Team, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Created attachment 168281 [details] The example file in Excel 13 and LO7.2 nightly Still a problem in: Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: e97a81e94511b52987a50b7bdb72c922899da588 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU); UI: en-US Calc: CL To clarify this example file was made in Excel 2010.
@Tibor maybe one more for you? This imports the condition as "1,23" but it really should just use 1,23 to get the same effect (for the number type cells at least).
Dear NISZ LibreOffice Team, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still repro with: Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: e46e663cc350d89e4997095466d675b875eb2e04 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
As of a recent LO Dev 24.2, IMHO the "Contains" conditional format is not working as expected, whether it is imported from xlsx, or in a new (ods) file. IMHO, the "Contains" type of condition should not require to use quotation marks in order to return TRUE for the condition on non-numeric values. (However, I am not sure whether changing this might have compatibility problems with older versions.) A condition such as 'Contains 1' should be evaluated independently of whether the value in the cell is text or number. If users want to restrict this to a specific type of value (e.g. either numeric values only, or text values only), they should add an additional condition. Currently, we have a somewhat-confusing situation. For example, starting from attachment 147527 [details] (from comment 1), if the condition is modified (menu Format > Conditional > Manage > Edit) from: 'Contains "1,23"' to: 'Contains 1,23' (without the quotation marks around the value) it results in all empty cells being TRUE for the condition; this result is not intuitive, or even not understandable/logical at all (at least for users).