Case: Large and important Calc file going back 10 years, that was carefully laid out and setup, back in LO 3.x, updated fine through the years, using exact size width columns and Arial 6 to input about 36 columns and 44 rows, perfectly rendered on screen.
Computer nor display have changed since OS X 10.12.
Updated to LO 546 last year, and all of sudden I have lots of number cells with 2E+05 3E+05 etc
Again, nothing changed to the computer setup, file, data, cell formatting, ... only LO updated.
Upon investigation it seems that 1 digit's worth of free space is now required in front and behind the actual number, or LO Calc goes all 2E+05 3E+05
Totally ineffective and unbelievable. The numbers fit just fine. Where is programmed padding requirement suddenly coming from, that I now have to reduce the formatting to Arial Narrow 5pt ?!
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open file created back in 3.x 4.x with 0.30" columns and font type Arial 6pt or 5pt, add numbers with 6 digits
Six digits numbers are all rendered as 2E+05 3E+06 etc
Render the numbers legibly as old fashioned numbers on screen
User Profile Reset: No
OpenGL enabled: Yes
I don't know when this exactly came about. I use this important file intermittently. For at least 8 years. Once in a while I would get a ### on screen and the easy fix was to drop that cell from Arial 6 to Arial 5 and it would show the number again.
Having to use Arial 5 Narrow is painful to the eyes ...
And if I could, I would add screenshots that clearly show it is not required to go 5pt font because one could fit an 8 digit number in the box now !!!
Please fix it by lowering the padding requirement to what it was.
Please fix also drop the scientific notation method. It is undesirable to me. #### stands out visually. 2E+05 does not.
I can be reached as email@example.com
---------//// OPEN GL REPORT //// ----------
Renderer: Intel HD Graphics 4000 OpenGL Engine
Vendor: Intel Inc.
Memory: 1536 MB
Version: 4.1 INTEL-10.25.17
Shading language version: 4.10
Max texture size: 16384 x 16384
Max vertex texture image units: 16
Max texture image units: 16
Max geometry texture units: 16
Max anisotropic filtering value: 16
Max viewport size: 16384 x 16384
Max Clip Distances: 8
Max samples: 8
v3.0 (100 % - 23/23)
v3.1 (100 % - 8/8)
v3.2 (100 % - 10/10)
v3.3 (100 % - 10/10)
v4.0 (100 % - 14/14)
v4.1 (100 % - 7/7)
v4.2 (15 % - 2/13)
v4.3 (0 % - 0/23)
v4.4 (0 % - 0/10)
v4.5 (0 % - 0/11)
v4.6 (0 % - 0/11)
vARB 2015 (0 % - 0/12)
OpenGL driver version check (Current: 4.1 INTEL-10.25.17, Latest known: ):
Latest version of display drivers found
According the database, you are running the latest display drivers for your video card.
Created attachment 149627 [details]
cells with 6 digits go into scientific notation
screenshots of cells with a 6 digit number, that were shown on screen and printed fine for years, now are unreadable scientific notation
Created attachment 149628 [details]
bypass the problem with even smaller font showing how much space is required and wasted by padding
screenshot showing how calc requires me to change the font from Arial to Arial Narrow and down to 5pt ... the 6 digit number is finally shown again, but look at all the wasted padding space ... in the older days that would hold a 7 digit or 8 digit number
We're guessing here as we would need your document (anonymize by changing values to "8" s). But IIUC the autoformatting to Scientific notation for "General" numbers has not changed.
Font's change from system to build to system build--Arial on OSX is not Arial on Windows. Also LibreOffices font handling has been changed several times in the interim. There also have been changes to calc for calculating cell height and cell width, as well as adjustments to how "Use printer metrics for text formatting" behaves.
So it would be abnormal to not have some layout changes in the ensuing builds and versions of your document.
So please do this. Make a copy of the document. Then open the copy and select the active cells on the sheet, set your font size back to 6pt--and in the Column label area select one of the grid lines. Open context menu and apply "Optimal Width".
Are the resulting cell widths more acceptable--and does it fit as you'd prefer? Also, does selecting another font format things better than Arial? Perhaps a Monospaced font like Consolas, Liberation Mono, or DejaVu Sans Mono?
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.
For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.
Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):
a) Provide details of your system including your operating
system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
confirmed the bug to be present
b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better
c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem
d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help
e) Read all comments and provide any requested information
Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:
a) respond via email
b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
on the top section of our bug tracker