Download it now!
Bug 125353 - it cannot trim an OLE object of Cad aplications
Summary: it cannot trim an OLE object of Cad aplications
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
6.2.3.2 release
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: OLE-Objects
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2019-05-18 13:03 UTC by Palo
Modified: 2019-06-06 09:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
OLE objekt in the file. (66.55 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2019-05-18 13:09 UTC, Palo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Palo 2019-05-18 13:03:57 UTC
Description:
It cannot trim after inserting an OLE object of Cad aplications (Autocad,...)
When it is inserted as an image(or as a GDI), the scale is broken, or fonts, or the data volume is too large(more images in the file).
(When I used word, it worked an OLE to trim.)
It would be great if it worked in LO writer too.  

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Trim an OLE object of Cad aplications
2.
3.

Actual Results:
?

Expected Results:
?


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
?
Comment 1 Palo 2019-05-18 13:09:27 UTC
Created attachment 151498 [details]
OLE objekt in the file.

OLE objekt in the file. It cannot trim after inserting an OLE object of Cad aplications (Autocad,...) and cannot scaling.
Comment 2 Dieter 2019-06-06 09:12:54 UTC
I confirm the described behaviour with

Version: 6.3.0.0.beta1 (x64)
Build ID: a187af327633f5f00363be5131bd21a13e0f1a7b
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default; VCL: win; 
Locale: en-US (de_DE); UI-Language: en-GB
Calc: threaded

But I as far as I know it isn't LO doesn't allow to crop OLE-Objects (there is at least no Crop-Tab in the object dialog

@ Regina: Is this a general limitation of odf-format or could this be an enhancement? Or am I totally wrong?