Created attachment 151876 [details]
That file I created myself. It contains the section and the field - you can try starting from step 5.
1. Windows10 LO version 126.96.36.199
2. Debian Linux Stretch LO version 188.8.131.52 (stable)
3. Debian Linux Stretch LO version 184.108.40.206 (backports)
4. Debian Linux Stretch LO version 220.127.116.11 (flatpak)
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create new document.
2. Menu: Insert->Fields->More fields
2.1. Tab Variable
2.2. Set variable
2.3. Format: general
2.4. Name: mycondb
2.5. Value: 2
2.6. Button "Insert"
3. Type some text and select it
4. Menu: Insert->Section
4.1. Section name for example mycond
4.2. Check box "Hide"
4.3. In field "With condition" type in "mycondb LEQ 1"
4.4. Button "Insert"
5. Double click field mycondb and set value to 1
If section will disappear, then set field value again to 2 and then again to 1.
Result: section does not disappear, if you go to Format->Sections, you will see that condition text that we entered at the step 4.3 disappeared and there is only "0" there.
Expected result: section will appear and disappear, condition will not be changed.
attaching 2 example files.
File #1 test_section_condition_broken.odt That file I created myself. It contains the section and the field - you can try starting from step 5.
File #2 test_section_condition_working.odt - file with the section and field which is surprisingly working! The difference is that I do not created that file, but downloaded from the link on this page https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/132219/can-you-use-conditional-text-in-libreoffice/
Created attachment 151877 [details]
The file that suprisingly works!!! But it is downloaded, not created by myself
confirming with LO 18.104.22.168, but not with LO 6.3 Master
maybe a duplicate of:
Bug 104816 - Inserting a user field will lose the condition of section
The "working" version didn't work for me. Used bibisect to confirm that this is a duplicate of 104816, so it is fixed in 6.3.
(tested with Ubuntu 18.04)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 104816 ***
Created attachment 151880 [details]
this one is working
try to set the field to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Is there flatpak version of 6.3?
Tested with debian packages, confirming it is fixed. Thank you.