Bug 128033 - SharePoint integration for easy revision comparison
Summary: SharePoint integration for easy revision comparison
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
unspecified
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: SharePoint
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2019-10-08 16:47 UTC by Daniel Grigoras
Modified: 2019-10-13 15:15 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:
Regression By:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Grigoras 2019-10-08 16:47:01 UTC
Description:
It would be nice to replicate MS Word's SharePoint integration and easy revision comparison of the latest version of a document in a SharePoint Library with an older revision of that document.

Steps to Reproduce:
-

Actual Results:
-

Expected Results:
-


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
-
Comment 1 V Stuart Foote 2019-10-08 19:51:32 UTC
Clearly out of scope, that level of "integration" would require excessive dev effort with native MS libs. 

Not reasonable to even consider this when we still have OneDrive/SharePoint CMIS connection issues of bug 62437

IMHO => WF
Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2019-10-09 08:14:19 UTC
Not cross-platform, proprietary software, unclear use case. Agree with WF but it's not really a question for UX.
Comment 3 Roman Kuznetsov 2019-10-13 14:31:12 UTC
Mike, what do you think?
Comment 4 Mike Kaganski 2019-10-13 15:15:12 UTC
This is perfectly in scope. Despite being filed against SharePoint, the point here is implementing *Versioning* part of *WebDAV* specification, and having ability to compare different versions of the same versioned resource.

It isn't likely to be implemented soon, however. Yet, as usual, I'm definitely against closing "unlikely-to-happen-soon" issues as WONTFIX, they won't by miracle become resolved or irrelevant by that.