Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a new presentation in 4:3 format 2. Import an image 3. Put a formula under the image 4. Choose Slide->Properties...->Format and resize to 16:9 The problem is that both of these objects are now down-scaled vertically but not horizontally. If instead, you choose to uncheck the box "fit object to paper format", then all the content at the bottom of the slide will run off the bottom of the newly formatted slide. Why doesn't the switch to 16:9 simply widen the slide equally on both sides? It looks like the current implementation fixes width while making the height smaller.
Created attachment 156365 [details] Test 1 ODP Thanks for report. It's preferable to attach a sample document. I attach some now, hope it shows.
Created attachment 156367 [details] Test 1 compared 4-3 and 16-9 I confirm the behavior in master 6.5+. Already seen in LO 3.6, where 4:3 and 16:9 are first available in Format-Page. I'll set New, although this may turn out not to be a bug. Let's ask UX. Workaround is to set Original Size.
Clearly a bug to me, and annoying for many users so at least average relevance. Wonder that we shouldn't have a duplicate for this.
Dear thekswenson, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still reproducible with Version: 7.3.5.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US 7.3.5-3 Calc: threaded
*** Bug 151175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 135591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Repro in OOo 3.3, so inherited. OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 OOO330m20 (Build:9567) Also reproduced in recent master build: Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 579d144290c1617fdb38d09b30900a6bbe390b8d CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fr-FR (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded