Created attachment 155903 [details] 2 Graphics In 2Graphics.odt, Fig·2, 4 contain Graphics. Why are the background colours different, and not #83CAFF, as specified by style Graphics under Area>Color?
Thank you for reporting the bug. I can confirm the bug present in Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha1+ (x86) Build ID: ec7374ff84c71edfbb30d6e4dc5b486b6df7107f CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render: default; VCL: win; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2019-11-10_21:37:30 Locale: en-US (en_US); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded But cannot confirm in LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4 As I'm able to apply different background colors only for fig.4
@Regina, do you know why it's happening ?
The left graphic is a .emf image, which is itself full transparent with black lines. So you see the color of the containing <draw:frame> element. This color is blue with 50% transparency. That mixes up with the orange of the "figure" frame to color "olive". The right graphic is a .svm image, which is itself not transparent, but has black lines and white area between the lines. So you cannot see the color of the containing <draw:frame> element at all.
Regina, so this is not actually a bug?
(In reply to Chris Sherlock from comment #4) > Regina, so this is not actually a bug? It is not a bug. The different rendering is due to the actual properties of the two graphics.
The right graphic is a.svm picture with black lines and white space between them, but it is not translucent. As a result, the color of the enclosing draw:frame> element is completely hidden. This is a blue hue with a 50% transparency. This is combined with the orange of the "figure" frame to create the color "olive." https://2player.co