Steps to reproduce: 1. Open attachment 151278 [details] from bug 118991 it takes real 0m25,717s user 0m25,095s sys 0m0,441s in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 9163755e9f64a0b1dd5f2090e0702c19e31c12c9 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded while in Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: c98b1f1cd43b3e109bcaf6324ef2d1f449b34099 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded it takes real 0m5,004s user 0m4,382s sys 0m0,472s thus, its 5 times slower in master
Regression introduced by: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2c918aa51e5528b090e52fa31b10fa17cf2593ae author László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org> 2019-11-19 21:12:28 +0100 committer László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org> 2019-11-21 19:50:25 +0100 commit 2c918aa51e5528b090e52fa31b10fa17cf2593ae (patch) tree 27bcd35ab6c0929fadb0c44ee88a7a7a3e9e785f parent 46f8f48ebfe25e26b4d1c0718c772abbee70b889 (diff) tdf#125300 extend AddParaSpacingToTableCells with line spacing Bisected with: bibisect-linux64-6.5 Adding Cc: to László Németh
@Julien, would it be possible to have a flamegraph for this issue ?
I used 'time OOO_EXIT_POST_STARTUP=1 instdir/program/soffice <file>' for the measurement
Created attachment 158956 [details] perf flamegraph Here's a Flamegraph retrieved on pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today.
6.2m 3,36s user 0,57s system 27% cpu 14,278 total 6.4m 2,12s user 0,56s system 17% cpu 15,653 total 7.0m 2,54s user 0,49s system 17% cpu 17,264 total 7.4+ 2,11s user 0,45s system 55% cpu 4,579 total I think this is WFM. Please retest opening 1st and 2nd time.
5.2m 1st time 2,55s user 0,37s system 19% cpu 14,696 total 5.2m 2nd time 2,68s user 0,24s system 94% cpu 3,102 total 6.2m 1st time 3,27s user 0,52s system 25% cpu 14,991 total 6.2m 2nd time 3,38s user 0,37s system 98% cpu 3,825 total 7.3m 1st time 2,13s user 0,63s system 13% cpu 20,052 total 7.3m 2nd time 2,32s user 0,37s system 99% cpu 2,715 total 7.4+ 1st time 2,59s user 0,40s system 33% cpu 9,010 total 7.4+ 2nd time 2,20s user 0,29s system 97% cpu 2,558 total I don't see a regression here.
So now is the time as with 43all oldest: 1st time 0,59s user 0,43s system 9% cpu 10,766 total 2nd time 0,76s user 0,30s system 58% cpu 1,798 total