<https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/760c03c8ee16ecfa7620174c0eabc9812cba9a83%5E!/> "INTEGRATION: CWS insight01" had introduced OApplicationController::elementReplaced in dbaccess/source/ui/app/AppController.cxx as > +void SAL_CALL OApplicationController::elementReplaced( const ContainerEvent& _rEvent ) throw(RuntimeException) > +{ > + ::vos::OGuard aSolarGuard(Application::GetSolarMutex()); > + ::osl::MutexGuard aGuard(m_aMutex); > + > + Reference< XNameAccess > xNames(_rEvent.Source, UNO_QUERY); > + if ( xNames == m_xCurrentContainer || ::std::find(m_aCurrentSubContainers.begin(),m_aCurrentSubContainers.end(),Reference< XContainer >(xNames,UNO_QUERY)) != m_aCurrentSubContainers.end() ) > + { > + OSL_ENSURE(getContainer(),"View is NULL! -> GPF"); > + ::rtl::OUString sName; > + try > + { > + _rEvent.Accessor >>= sName; > + Reference<XConnection> xConnection; > + Reference<XPropertySet> xProp(_rEvent.Element,UNO_QUERY); > + ::rtl::OUString sNewName; > + > + ElementType eType = getContainer()->getElementType(); > + switch( eType ) > + { > + case E_TABLE: > + ensureConnection(xConnection); > + if ( xProp.is() && xConnection.is() ) > + { > + sNewName = ::dbaui::composeTableName(xConnection->getMetaData(),xProp,sal_False,::dbtools::eInDataManipulation); > + } > + break; > + case E_FORM: > + case E_REPORT: > + { > + Reference<XContent> xContent(xNames,UNO_QUERY); > + if ( xContent.is() ) > + { > + sName = xContent->getIdentifier()->getContentIdentifier() + ::rtl::OUString(RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM("/")) + sName; > + } > + } > + break; > + } > + // getContainer()->elementReplaced(getContainer()->getElementType(),sName,sNewName,xConnection); > + } > + catch( Exception& ) > + { > + OSL_ENSURE(0,"Exception catched"); > + } > + } > +} with the call to getContainer()->elementReplaced(...) commented out right from the start (and the code is still effectively the same today at <https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/6647a167400753df45dba788ed793d55ca0be9f8/dbaccess/source/ui/app/AppController.cxx#1537>). That means that all the code in that function effectively does nothing, except for potentially relevant side effects hidden behind any of its function calls. The question is whether the function should be removed, or the commented-out code be enabled.