Created attachment 162410 [details] ImageGroupTest1.ods source data Reproduction procedure: (1) open attached ImageGroupTest1.ods (2) shift-click select the 2 images and Right-click select "Group" command. (3) resize the grouped image. (4) select the grouped image. (5) Right-click select "Original Size" command. Expected result: The grouped image should return to the original size. For this example, exactly fit in cell range B2:C6 Actual result: Nothing happens. Grouped image stays resized. See attached ImageGroupTest2.ods Frequency: 100% This problem is further hurting because when you resize an image group by mouse, but forgot to shift-drag to keep the aspect ratio, then you always distort your photo. If you have noticed it immediately then Undo works, but if you missed that chance, you can't repair it. Non-grouped images can returned to original size (and aspect ratio) at any time late, even in a later session. Grouped image behaviour is inconsistent with this. P.S. Related bug: Again in ImageGroupTest1.ods, this time: (1) shift-click select both images but do not "Group" command. (2) Resize the selection. (3) Right-click select "Original Size" command. The size of images will return to original, but their position are random, not the original position.
Created attachment 162411 [details] ImageGroupTest2.ods test result
This is definitely an odd scenario. Both bugs still work even in modern devices. Any idea why this is so? I mean Undo helps but only slightly. Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 52820b52b3bca45e2db527d1cc5f4488b2e0b9d0 CPU threads: 8; OS: Mac OS X 10.15.6; UI render: default; VCL: osx Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Confirmed and also reproduced with other images. Already seen in 3.3.0 on Windows (In reply to zzz from comment #0) > P.S. Related bug: > Again in ImageGroupTest1.ods, this time: > (1) shift-click select both images but do not "Group" command. > (2) Resize the selection. > (3) Right-click select "Original Size" command. > The size of images will return to original, but their position are random, > not the original position. I confirm this as well, but can you please open a new report for it? You can add me to the Cc field while you create it and I will confirm it. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 48570b9b5e4939069f8a1a2541fd4efe6f2bb0aa CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.11; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 18 March 2021
Dear zzz, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Symptom still happens in Version: 7.6.2.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 56f7684011345957bbf33a7ee678afaf4d2ba333 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: ja-JP (ja_JP); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded The "Related bug" still remains too. The position of the lower image comes to the lower edge of the resized box.