Description: Paste as RTF substantial slow compared to save as RTF Steps to Reproduce: 1. open the attached file 2. CTRL+A 3. CTRL+C 4. CTRL+N 5. CTRL+SHIFT+V -> RTF -> 40 seconds 6. Back to the original document -> Save as RTF -> 15 seconds Actual Results: 40 seconds Expected Results: Around 15 seconds Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: c48e4d795e37f23b71d647247590807ab9e52223 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL
Created attachment 162621 [details] Example file
Created attachment 162622 [details] Alternative example 5 seconds save RTF 20 seconds paste as RTF
(In reply to Telesto from comment #2) > Created attachment 162622 [details] > Alternative example 7.1 7 seconds save 28 seconds paste as rtf 4.4.7.2 > 5 seconds save RTF > 20 seconds paste as RTF 4.3 1 second Save RTF 20 seconds paste as RTF 4.2 2 seconds save RTF 15 seconds paste as RTF 4.1.0.3 Save as RTF -> Crash 3.5.7.2 3 seconds save RTF 10 seconds paste as RTF
Hi Telesto, Could you please try to reproduce it with a master build from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ ? You can install it alongside the standard version. I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the master build
No change.. Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 28555fc345ac2ccdda0e4e0f3c812c646befe68b CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL
@NISZ Maybe interested. Debugger does show numerous times: warn:sw.core:9604:4448:sw/source/core/doc/textboxhelper.cxx:548: SwTextBoxHelper::syncProperty: unhandled property: Graphic Apparently this case not being covered -> https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sw/source/core/doc/textboxhelper.cxx?r=d7e5fa3b#421 ---- However also something else appears to cause (more) lag warn:legacy.osl:9604:4448:sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx:428: Not possible surely 424 bool MSWordExportBase::SetCurrentPageDescFromNode(const SwNode &rNd) 425 { 426 bool bNewPageDesc = false; 427 const SwPageDesc* pCurrent = SwPageDesc::GetPageDescOfNode(rNd); 428 OSL_ENSURE(pCurrent && m_pCurrentPageDesc, "Not possible surely");
I confirm the difference with latest of Linux 7.4 bibisect repo. I tried with oldest of Linux 43max bibisect repo, but it seemed to take forever, so I gave up. Maybe someone is luckier on Windows.
Created attachment 178015 [details] Perf flamegraph The graph seems fine even though I got many of these while processing it: BFD: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 1c6a Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 2b95b55983689d5476e89c27177351e2d6785047 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.16; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
(In reply to Telesto from comment #2) > Created attachment 162622 [details] > Alternative example Still reproducible. ~5 seconds saving as RTF with above sample. ~25 seconds paste as RTF Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 806362b915ee89a4f907905a8ac8c1527ea99223 CPU threads: 6; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22631; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded