Bug 135434 - Lack of female ordinal numbers
Summary: Lack of female ordinal numbers
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 133842
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
6.4.4.2 release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-08-04 13:14 UTC by Clésio Pinheiro
Modified: 2020-08-04 15:57 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Clésio Pinheiro 2020-08-04 13:14:34 UTC
I don’t know if this situation could be called a bug exactly, but anyway, the problem is when you want a list of ordinal numbers (first, second, third, etc.)  writer can do it well cos in English you don’t have difference between a male and a female word.
But, when you use, as far as I know, Latin based languages (i mean Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, etc) they do differentiate if the substantive is a male or a female word.

For example:

Portuguese – male: primeiro, segundo, terceiro
Portuguese – female: primeira, segunda, terceira

Italian – male: primo, secondo, terzo
Italian – female: prima, seconda, terza

Spanish – male: primero, segundo, tercero
Spanish – female: primera, segunda, tercera

So writer do have a type of number for male ordinal, but if you need a female ordinal number it don’t have.
Comment 1 Dieter 2020-08-04 15:57:54 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133842 ***