Description: In attached CALC file I made some classical copy+paste and then replicated a format from existing cells to the newly created cells (including merged cells E30:E32 and G30:G32). After these operations, CALC displays a correct value in the merged cells (in E32 and G32), but also displays an incorrect value resulting from another calculus in the same place, making the result un-readable (and of course incorrect). In "Steps to reproduce" I only write about E30:E32 since the problem is the same for G30:G32. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Look at E30:E32 and see that the result displayed is un-readable 2.Click on single cell E30 or E31: the formula is the good one (=average of D30:D32)and 3 merged cells selected at the same time 3.Click on E32: the formula is shifted to other cells, and only E32 is selected Actual Results: explained yet Expected Results: When clicking E30,E31 or E32 equally, all 3 merged cells E30:E32 should be selected, and only 1 correct formula sould be shown. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No OpenGL enabled: Yes Additional Info: Version : 6.4.6.2 (x64) Build ID : 0ce51a4fd21bff07a5c061082cc82c5ed232f115 Threads CPU : 2; OS : Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI Render : par défaut; VCL: win; Locale : fr-FR (fr_FR); Langue IHM : fr-FR Calc: threaded
Created attachment 165482 [details] The config in CALC/TOOLS/LIBRE OFFICE
Created attachment 165483 [details] The info sent by GL-VIEW regarding OpenGL
Created attachment 165484 [details] Complete report from GL-VIEW
Created attachment 165485 [details] The CALC file with bug detected
Sorry but bug is not reproducible any more...
Hello bmourlevat, Thank you for reporting the bug. it seems you're using an old version of LibreOffice. Could you please try to reproduce it with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ? I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the latest version.
The bug was not reproducible about 2 weeks after I sent the bug report. Thanks.
The bug was not reproducible about 1 week after I sent the bug report. I do not remember if I updated the software in the meantime. Thanks.