Bug 140330 - Conditional formatting breaks after redoing cell deletion
Summary: Conditional formatting breaks after redoing cell deletion
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
6.1 all versions
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bibisected, bisected, regression
Depends on:
Blocks: Conditional-Formatting
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2021-02-11 09:34 UTC by Xisco Faulí
Modified: 2023-02-12 03:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:
Regression By:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Xisco Faulí 2021-02-11 09:34:27 UTC 
I found this issue while creating a UItest for bug 104026 < https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/110753 >

Steps to reproduce it:
1. Open attachment from 128858 bug 104026
2. Delete Row 2
3. Undo
4. Redo

-> Conditional format breaks and the condition becomes "Cell value != Sheet1.$B#REF!"

Reproduced in

Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 066799b4a162aa0a4bc6aa28339f1f943a13971e
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
Comment 1 Xisco Faulí 2021-02-11 09:36:11 UTC 
Regression introduced by:

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3f614f431475e1bf3bb3bbeac59b0681309628b7

author	Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>	2017-12-01 15:25:56 +0300
committer	Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>	2017-12-11 23:29:26 +0100
commit 3f614f431475e1bf3bb3bbeac59b0681309628b7 (patch)
tree 104fc56d968dd51802b658d97775c02e06424524
parent 7d202623b007979d9d0f93f6cd62c3c031d6d1d4 (diff)
tdf#95295: don't add duplicate conditional formats

Bisected with: bibisect-linux64-6.1

Adding Cc: to Mike Kaganski
Comment 2 Xisco Faulí 2021-02-11 09:38:20 UTC 
@Eike, I thought you might be interested in this issue
Comment 3 QA Administrators 2023-02-12 03:21:05 UTC 
Dear Xisco Faulí,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug