Description: Using Oracle Linux Server 8 with system policy set to FIPS:OSPP and trying to convert rtf to pdf using LibreOffice 7.0.4 and the conversion fails. Running the following command as root ./soffice --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /tmp /tmp/abc.rtf The output seen is convert /tmp/abc.rtf -> /tmp/abc.pdf using filter : writer_pdf_Export Error: Please verify input parameters... (SfxBaseModel::impl_store <file:///tmp/abc.pdf> failed: 0xc10(Error Area:Io Class:Write Code:16) /home/buildslave/source/libo-core/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:3153 /home/buildslave/source/libo-core/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1735) Strangely, all other conversion works as expected (rtf to html, rtf to doc, rtf to odt). Also, I tried to convert rtf to pdf using LibreOffice 5.1.2.2 on the same Oracle Linux Server 8.3 and the conversion worked. Content of abc.rtf is simply – Hello World. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a simple rtf file 2. ./soffice --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir <dir_name> abc.rtf 3. Conversion fail Actual Results: Error: Please verify input parameters... (SfxBaseModel::impl_store <file:///tmp/abc.pdf> failed: 0xc10(Error Area:Io Class:Write Code:16) /home/buildslave/source/libo-core/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:3153 /home/buildslave/source/libo-core/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1735) Expected Results: rtf to pdf conversion successful Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: This is the security level update-crypto-policies --show FIPS:OSPP
Created attachment 170727 [details] source file input rtf file
Created attachment 170728 [details] log file produced the log file using the flag --strace
Looks duplicate. Please mark other bug New. And write there of this also happens in GUI. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 131323 ***
I have added a comment in bug 131323 . As for me writing "And write there of this also happens in GUI" - I can't do that as I did not try in GUI, I don't see the point trying in GUI as direct calls to soffice is failing the conversion.
Please don't change duplicate status, unless you have an explication why it's not a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 131323 ***