Created attachment 171224 [details] backtrace with symbols This bug will be apparent only in --enable-dbgutil builds. STR (1) Download comp.zip <https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=166615> attached to bug 137592 (2) Unpack comp.zip (3) Open control/variantA/AffectedDocument.odt. (4) At prompt "... update all links ... ?", click <Yes>. Observed: LibreOffice exits with message (rewrapped): soffice.bin: /home/terry/lo_hacking/git/libo6/sw/source/core/bastyp/ bparr.cxx:84: BigPtrEntry* BigPtrArray::operator[](sal_uLong) const: Assertion `idx < m_nSize' failed. The backtrace is from commit f3b6fd1f (2021-03-16), configured --with-vendor=Terrence Enger --with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java --enable-split-debug --enable-gdb-index --enable-ld=gold --enable-option-checking=fatal --enable-dbgutil --enable-debug --without-system-postgresql --without-myspell-dicts --with-extra-buildid --without-doxygen --with-external-tar=/home/terry/lo_hacking/git/src --without-package-format built and running on debian-buster. Based on https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137592#c7 I am setting version 4.3.0.4 release. Bug 88454 reports the same assertion. It is in a different context, so I am creating a new bug report. However, the presence to tables in both test cases may or may not suggest something
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce this with this same exact bt.
BTW, m_nSize = 48 that's why the assert triggers since idx = 48
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I don't reproduce this anymore. Terrence: could you give a try with a recent build from master sources?
Dear Terrence Enger, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping
Dear Terrence Enger, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp