Description: Serverless collaborative real-time editing using LibreOffice Community Please enable LibreOffice Community edition to be used collaboratively and in real-time without the need to set up and host a server, i.e. serverless, nor use a cloud-server (which really means you are storing all your information on someone else’s computer). [Jami](https://jami.net/) is: * a client and also a server; and * an application with a one-click install. Jami runs on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, iOS, Android, AndroidTV so seems like a great fit for LibreOffice Technology which uses the same core on all platforms. Jami uses Distributed Hash Tables so that all client are servers and with their swarm technology all participants are kept in synchronisation, even if there are intermittent connections. Please also see issue https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/jami-project/-/issues/1010 on the Jami issue tracker. What do you think of Jami and LibreOffice? Thank you Postscript: You might also like to visit https://www.remotehq.com/ Steps to Reproduce: Please enable LibreOffice Community edition to be used collaboratively and in real-time without the need to set up and host a server, i.e. serverless, nor use a cloud-server (which really means you are storing all your information on someone else’s computer). Actual Results: No instructions on how this is currently possible. Expected Results: Use LibreOffice Community edition collaboratively and in real-time with other users with [Jami](https://jami.net/). Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: https://jami.net/ https://jami.biz/ https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux https://review.jami.net/ https://dl.jami.net/ https://www.transifex.com/savoirfairelinux/jami https://www.transifex.com/savoirfairelinux/jams-jami-account-management-server/ https://www.transifex.com/savoirfairelinux/jami-website/ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIe47cCt_ovwKb2Nfr4nBlw/ https://forum.jami.net/ https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-project/-/wikis/features/All-features-by-client
I would prefer Retroshare because I am a contributor to it https://github.com/RetroShare/RetroShare
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #1) > I would prefer Retroshare because I am a contributor to it > https://github.com/RetroShare/RetroShare Hmm, I see you referenced my comment in https://github.com/RetroShare/RetroShare/issues/2494 However, my point was that instead of Jami, I would prefer Retroshare. Objectively, though, this request should be rejected. If Jami wants to use LibreOffice, they are free to do so. There is also a request for real-time and offline collaboration: bug 133984.