Created attachment 179110 [details] Video showing the bug In Impress/Draw, if you select 3 or more objects, right-click them and go to Distribute Selection > Horizontally Spacing, the objects should be re-positioned so that the horizontal spacing between them is the same. This works nicely when objects do not have shadows. However, when shadows are enabled, the horizontal spacing is calculated incorrectly. See the attached video where I use 2 sets with three rectangles each. The first set does not have shadows and horizontal spacing works fine. Enabling shadows in the second set of rectangles breaks spacing calculations. Steps to reproduce: 1) Open the attached sample ODP file 2) Select the 3 rectangles without shadows 3) Go to Distribute Selection > Horizontally Spacing 4) Notice the three rectangles are spaced evenly (which is expected) 5) Now select the three rectangles with shadows 6) Go to Distribute Selection > Horizontally Spacing 7) Notice that the spacing between rectangles is not the same System info: Version: 7.3.1.3 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:3) CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.1~rc3-0ubuntu0.21.10.1~lo2 Calc: threaded
Created attachment 179111 [details] Sample ODP file This is the sample ODP file I used in the video.
Repro, already in 7.1 when shadows were implemented. Arch Linux 64-bit, X11 Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 88ebc324a51f16df0248d6a0d53d2169b1995dda CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.1; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Jumbo Built on 3 January 2023
Dear Rafael Lima, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug