Created attachment 180224 [details] Video showing the bug In Impress if you create two independent numbered lists that use the same numbering style in the same slide, it is not possible to restart numbering at 1 in the second list. See attached video showing the bug. The second time I apply the numbering style, it should start at 1 because it is a separate sequence of items. The only way to make it start at 1 again is to use a different numbering style, which shouldn't be necessary because a different style will look different. The video was done using LO 7.4 but this bug also affects 7.3. System info: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha1+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: ad6905f9a09c63712ba0aaffc700923246d21e55 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: CL
Created attachment 180225 [details] Behavior when unordered list is applied first One interesting finding is that if first I select all items and click "Toggle unordered list" and then apply the numbering style, than it works as expected. However it becomes impossible to remove the unordered list afterwards. Notice that at the end of the video I disable the second "unordered list" and the numbering problem is back. The final result should be: Text 1) Description A 2) Description B More Text 1) Description C 2) Description D
Already seen in oldest of 43all Linux bibisect repo. Arch Linux 64-bit, X11 Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 0160109aae49189f5cc9bed60db3c7084003e471 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.1; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Jumbo Built on 16 January 2023
Dear Rafael Lima, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug