Description: I tried to insert an equation in word and try to see the differences in writer. surprisingly, the result on writer is very poor. although i can fix it manually but still troublesome by removing {} on {)} after rsub {3}. the arrow symbol with delta also quite different. I tried made an equation 1st through writer and open it in word. some word are not spaced Steps to Reproduce: 1.Insert a text in equation in word 2. Save and open the docx file in writer 3. Change the equation in word as a text form Actual Results: The equation in writer is different from word. Some word are missing. Expected Results: The same equation as in word Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No OpenGL enabled: Yes Additional Info: an equation 1st through writer and open it in word. some word are not spaced
Created attachment 181273 [details] Equation sample
Created attachment 181274 [details] Equation in word as text form
Created attachment 181275 [details] Equation in writer
Created attachment 181276 [details] Equation in writer after convert in word as a text
Cannot repro using Version: 7.4.0.1 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 43e5fcfbbadd18fccee5a6f42ddd533e40151bcf CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (ru_RU); UI: en-US Calc: CL
Not clear report. If this is about opening MSO files, Equation sample must be from MSO and this one is from LO. If this is about saving, Equation sample must be ODT from LO. Also, there are other bugs with DOCS and equation and question mark, you should search before reporting.
Not repro in Version: 7.3.4.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 Calc: threaded Also not repro in Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 61f5c991a97de8990badfed6ef840941b5aa8c7f CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded The equation in the DOCX file by the OP (attachment 181273 [details]) is opening correctly as shown in attachment 181274 [details].
Created attachment 181291 [details] new file
Comment on attachment 181291 [details] new file wrong file
Created attachment 181292 [details] New file
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
I set New.
Created attachment 181307 [details] The formula in Word 2016 It is definitely a compatibility issue. Just wanted to note that it's astonishing how the formula could get created in Word. The attachment shows the cursor set in the beginning of the formula; one may see which block is highlighted - it's "Ce(NO", which is not a reasonable formula block, including an opening parenthesis and an incomplete inner subexpression. This corresponds to the XML: > <m:sSub> > ... > <m:e> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>Ce(NO</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:e> > <m:sub> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>3</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:sub> > </m:sSub> > <m:sSub> > ... > <m:e> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>)</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:e> > <m:sub> > <m:r> > ... > <m:t>3</m:t> > </m:r> > </m:sub> > </m:sSub> And to the import result in Math: > {Ce(NO} rsub {3} {)} rsub {3} ... where all the parts in braces: "{Ce(NO}", "{3}", "{)}", and "{3}" correspond to the separate <m:sub> elements of the original formula. I wonder how can that be ever converted into a valid math expression, given the input - unless we treat every piece of such a "formula" as literal text, which would ruin all normal formulas.