Created attachment 184224 [details] bug example Steps to reproduce: - Starting with the attached autoscale.ods - Note that the initial y-axis scale goes from 60000 to 90000 - Enter 1 (or alarger number) in the empty B5 cell. - Note that the y-axis scale is now 0 to 90000 Expected behavior: - While the current behavior is not "incorrect" (since AFAICT the behavior of "automatic scaling" isn't defined), I wouldn't expect such a small change in the input to affect the graph in a so dramatic fashion. My preference would be to still have the original 60000 to 90000 scale. - In the original calc sheet on which this bug was detected, the "starting" value (i.e. B2) varies widely, so having to manually set the Y-axis autoscale minimum is not convenient.
Reproducible, it's an strange behavior calculating the min, also happens modifying other cells. In example, introducing 2000 in B8. Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 9b46020c262045aed0beace4708565235c2523cc CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded
Also the issue with LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4
Very much related to bug 43983, which looks at improving the documentation.
Dear jeanmarcranger, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
As asked, reproduced. Behavior matches the description. I only tried with the attached example - I didn't try to recreate it from scratch. Version: 24.8.3.2 (AARCH64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 48a6bac9e7e268aeb4c3483fcf825c94556d9f92 CPU threads: 8; OS: macOS 15.2; UI render: Skia/Metal; VCL: osx Locale: en-CA (en_CA.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded