Description: In the attached spreadsheet the first sheet contains a source table and a pivot side by side. The pivot is grouped by month and year. The second pivot on the other sheet has been created by just dragging the date to column fields and the values to data fields. It has been grouped by month automatically, but not by year since the Janurary sums include the values of both Januaries. When you remove the grouping from either pivot, it is removed from the other pivot as well even without manual refresh. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Click a pivot cell in the in one of the year/quarter/month columns and remove the grouping from one pivot (Ctrl+F12) 2. The pivot shows single dates 3. Actual Results: The second pivot also shows singel dates Expected Results: 2 pivots should be grouped independently from each other Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/how-to-properly-filter-by-date-in-a-pivot-table/86966/4
Created attachment 184921 [details] Spreadsheet with 2 pivots
I can confirm the Issue, with: Version: 7.0.4.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE Raspbian package version: 1:7.0.4-4+rpi1+deb11u3 Calc: threaded
(Alternative to Ctrl + F12 is Data > Group and Outline > Ungroup) Also reproduced with: Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: e125e6623fa1c0f39d927bb37547ca6d1e299cb1 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded and: Version: 6.1.0.3 Build ID: efb621ed25068d70781dc026f7e9c5187a4decd1 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2; Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); Calc: group threaded Looks like an old regression, as I can't reproduced in OOo: OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 OOO330m20 (Build:9567)
Repro in Версия 4.0.6.2 (ID сборки: 2e2573268451a50806fcd60ae2d9fe01dd0ce24) also Looks like not bibisectable
Dear Andreas Säger, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug