Description: Note example. The back drawing of the page hides the text. Yuo can´t solve sending the image to the back It is sowed correctly in Word Steps to Reproduce: 1.Simply open the file. You will not see the text of the file 2. 3. Actual Results: You can´t solve the situation sending the drawing to the back Expected Results: I expect to see it like the the example PDF Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Word well in Word. If you delete the background drawing the text is there
Created attachment 185476 [details] Word fiel with the problem
Created attachment 185477 [details] The file as a PDF generated with Word
Created attachment 185478 [details] The file generated as PDF with Writed 7.5
Reproducible in: Version: 7.6.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4a0d671706306661c4a5072ce4769dc47bc65f71 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
I move the top part of box from the first page a little bit down from the header and I changed the anchor from "To character" to "To page" and everything looks fine. Please try to play with this a little bit.
This changed in 7.3 with 7246e57216bb20c15af0ecf6a0183f5ffa81e780 tdf#143591 DOCX import: handle anchored objects as at-char Let's ask what Miklós thinks.
Word only has inline (our "as char") and anchored (our "at char") anchor types, so mapping anything to "to paragraph" would be data loss (you now only know the paragraph, not the character position), that's what the above commit fixes. When trying to see why much of the content from page 1 moves to page 2 in Writer, what caught my eye is that the wrap type of the full-page shape on page 1 is "parallel" in Writer, but it's "through" in Word. I guess the root of this problem will be this wrap type, since changing the wrap type to "through" on the Writer UI fixes the problem. I expect that was a problem before the above commit already, so the current "confirmed but, but not a regression from the above commit" state looks correct to me. Thanks.